From bluesky-dev-return-828-apmail-incubator-bluesky-dev-archive=incubator.apache.org@incubator.apache.org Wed Jan 20 04:14:08 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-incubator-bluesky-dev-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 95527 invoked from network); 20 Jan 2010 04:14:08 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 20 Jan 2010 04:14:08 -0000 Received: (qmail 90904 invoked by uid 500); 20 Jan 2010 04:14:08 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-incubator-bluesky-dev-archive@incubator.apache.org Received: (qmail 90856 invoked by uid 500); 20 Jan 2010 04:14:07 -0000 Mailing-List: contact bluesky-dev-help@incubator.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: bluesky-dev@incubator.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list bluesky-dev@incubator.apache.org Received: (qmail 90846 invoked by uid 99); 20 Jan 2010 04:14:06 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 20 Jan 2010 04:14:06 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=2.2 required=10.0 tests=HTML_MESSAGE,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of lovesummerf@gmail.com designates 209.85.160.41 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.160.41] (HELO mail-pw0-f41.google.com) (209.85.160.41) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 20 Jan 2010 04:13:58 +0000 Received: by pwj4 with SMTP id 4so3111972pwj.20 for ; Tue, 19 Jan 2010 20:13:37 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:in-reply-to:references :date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; bh=MtHVEKZnNx/AqOf/zP14SNKxD6iOL0sx1d4IB+9IJzA=; b=T2O5ubpE0ruZkBX+tJp0K33JfGp61WELh84RLGYRxcmjZHnacDR7V/LkLPFt4vXTDu f/mLM53arjRdlbit8NApLRtL/M4lOSlulWOytED1iLKwJRJmUsIjKBqdNwg3epGKv0Y+ AhW1l3KnX+y/QFv1gnAp7QeeGAj5AjeAqRavw= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type; b=XnzwfhbjtoL53t5Nhc91iHrr8/xoFmcAoMULBMQ1bAoLhQSEVTOhL5xxAH7tF0RTHy xwV1vl3hKd44hGel9XNAeU787bNhte+n075/fe4QN2kfEjkYbdMNoeB2dY+uPjgbxlN0 pJ9SrLccw5/DZYdCcSE/PnC2JbnOwiGiiovRg= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.114.243.8 with SMTP id q8mr5880076wah.66.1263960817202; Tue, 19 Jan 2010 20:13:37 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <17539d61001190408w24a2c78ai8c1b00efa0e5743e@mail.gmail.com> References: <6ec21e961001181744v30316bafnd564bee3d65e532a@mail.gmail.com> <17539d61001190408w24a2c78ai8c1b00efa0e5743e@mail.gmail.com> Date: Wed, 20 Jan 2010 12:13:37 +0800 Message-ID: <6ec21e961001192013ua4e4961s40911dd4b37bb00a@mail.gmail.com> Subject: Re: about the version number of RealClass rc From: Samuel Kevin To: bluesky-dev@incubator.apache.org Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=0016e64ca5b884f772047d90cf5f X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org --0016e64ca5b884f772047d90cf5f Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 all right, i will start making the new packages. 2010/1/19 Arthur Chen > I think it's ok. > > On 19/01/2010, Samuel Kevin wrote: > > hi, all: > > I just google checked some info about how to name version number. I > > guess it's ok to use RealClass 0.1.1 rc1 as the RealClass current version > > number, what do you think of that? > > regards, > > Kevin > > > > -- > > Bowen Ma a.k.a Samuel Kevin @ Bluesky Dev Team XJTU > > Shaanxi Province Key Lab. of Satellite and Terrestrial Network Tech > > http://incubator.apache.org/bluesky/ > > > -- Bowen Ma a.k.a Samuel Kevin @ Bluesky Dev Team XJTU Shaanxi Province Key Lab. of Satellite and Terrestrial Network Tech http://incubator.apache.org/bluesky/ --0016e64ca5b884f772047d90cf5f--