From bluesky-dev-return-213-apmail-incubator-bluesky-dev-archive=incubator.apache.org@incubator.apache.org Tue Sep 02 06:42:24 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-incubator-bluesky-dev-archive@locus.apache.org Received: (qmail 11258 invoked from network); 2 Sep 2008 06:42:23 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.2) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 2 Sep 2008 06:42:23 -0000 Received: (qmail 38380 invoked by uid 500); 2 Sep 2008 06:42:21 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-incubator-bluesky-dev-archive@incubator.apache.org Received: (qmail 38365 invoked by uid 500); 2 Sep 2008 06:42:21 -0000 Mailing-List: contact bluesky-dev-help@incubator.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: bluesky-dev@incubator.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list bluesky-dev@incubator.apache.org Received: (qmail 38352 invoked by uid 99); 2 Sep 2008 06:42:21 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 01 Sep 2008 23:42:21 -0700 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.0 required=10.0 tests=SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of bernd.fondermann@googlemail.com designates 209.85.200.171 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.200.171] (HELO wf-out-1314.google.com) (209.85.200.171) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 02 Sep 2008 06:41:23 +0000 Received: by wf-out-1314.google.com with SMTP id 27so2560759wfd.21 for ; Mon, 01 Sep 2008 23:41:44 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=googlemail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:to :subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type :content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; bh=wpyUXIdwajR3TKSEqzSOQaZo/SjbZrm8CAehRRfJVX0=; b=wb0zBSK0pJ63ikXD5YSHZ8Ieuc471yFBVerg54XiAum2e7gXbdXJxVTA5v9Xd32qcM fPnYS1TeG6icnxUzxAnA5YEfVd0JXIan24TBApNLL/vqff0f+NHOwLP44vc26ir0hHfv Af2HH7Va9lx//btm838exomC7GDhA09lRGxGY= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=googlemail.com; s=gamma; h=message-id:date:from:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version :content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition :references; b=edplIkfoTBYl/vtJOZIifNdNqPGgzALY0Pq/p2HPymcjZ8rOiKA4ThSgK3YC9AZUit AHjQ8bRW6HDlRSX9aXFJPSYOGWKJLI3INTGDGSzbgZZwR584WDZ3P0+iFwigt3erg7Yk 44NYKLJEo/vjHyG4PvZ5Knws3ihxOhndkx3zI= Received: by 10.142.58.5 with SMTP id g5mr2407213wfa.224.1220337704706; Mon, 01 Sep 2008 23:41:44 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.142.11.11 with HTTP; Mon, 1 Sep 2008 23:41:44 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <88f6e29a0809012341h65d4c7f5k6dd4e1a252661447@mail.gmail.com> Date: Tue, 2 Sep 2008 08:41:44 +0200 From: "Bernd Fondermann" To: bluesky-dev@incubator.apache.org Subject: Re: how do we deal with list.h In-Reply-To: <6ec21e960809010042m6fa8a86akdd0103a0a63c40e6@mail.gmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline References: <6ec21e960808112134p369f71d6t107b717701a8657e@mail.gmail.com> <6ec21e960808241815r18b9003ap812a07ff6dd96d74@mail.gmail.com> <88f6e29a0808242315p3959bae4qaa5e48c0957882cb@mail.gmail.com> <833e655e0808281831gbba4aa2ocb9c2aee821bbbea@mail.gmail.com> <6ec21e960808311844x92e4678m7cdd87da48497fa4@mail.gmail.com> <88f6e29a0808312232q714061e1g23dc60c541616fa6@mail.gmail.com> <6ec21e960809010042m6fa8a86akdd0103a0a63c40e6@mail.gmail.com> X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org By the way, another question: You are signing your mail with 'Bowen' while your from address reads 'Samul Kevin'. How are these two person interrelated? Just asking :-) Bernd On Mon, Sep 1, 2008 at 09:42, Samul Kevin wrote: > sorry that i don't understand you appropirately. > this is the first mail i send to him: > ---------- Forwarded message ---------- > From: Samul Kevin > Date: 2008-8-22 13:37 > Subject: consulting about the license of stlport > To: "consulting@stlport.com" > > > hi,our group is scratching a project which is incubating by Apache > Software Foundation.However,the c++ libarary what we are using (accordrance > with GPL) collide with Apache Software License.Thus we have to change the > libarary. > After browsing stlport license,i found that it might NOT collide with > ASL.So i write this letter to confirm if it's totally ok when we use stlport > under ASL. Appriciate your help.Thks > > > Sincerely yours > > Bowen > > and this is his reply: > ---------- Forwarded message ---------- > From: Boris Fomitchev > Date: 2008-8-23 4:26 > Subject: Re: consulting about the license of stlport > To: Samul Kevin > Cc: "consulting@stlport.com" > > Yes, sure - STLport license does not collide with ASL. > > Best, > -Boris. > > Then you ,Bernd,brought out the two questions about the relicense problem.I > had to say,i didn't quite get it at first time.Not until Jiangshan showed me > the importance of the license problem did realized it really of account to > make these license things clear.So i wrote to Boris the second letter,and i > quoted your question in the letter: > I feel terribly sorry that i don't make my question in detail.the mentors of > our project wondered that " What license has stlport and can/will it be > relicensed to ASL?" > we used c++ stl which obeys the GPL license.Unfortunately,it's in the > excluded catagory of Apache license.So we had to find another c++ > stl.Somebody told us STLPORT is good and may be appropiate to our project.So > i have to make it clear that if the license of STLPORT can be relicensed to > ASL. > this is the license of ASL > http://apache.org/licenses/LICENSE-2.0 > this is the Third-Party Licensing Policy,i wanna know that whether the > STLPORT lisence belongs to the authorized catagory. > http://apache.org/legal/3party.html > > appriciate your help > > sincerely yours > > Bowen > > He have't answered it yet. i don't know if it's the question you wanna > us to resolve.It's true that we do have some communication problem and i > think the only way to fix it is to communicate MORE.So don't cherish your > critics,just bring them on^_^. > > > 2008/9/1, Bernd Fondermann : >> >> On Mon, Sep 1, 2008 at 03:44, Samul Kevin wrote: >> > i wrote to the author to confirm that.waiting for the answer now^_^ >> >> As said before, it is good practice to copy the list with what you >> wrote him and copy his answer to the list, too. >> So everyone can actually take part in deal with this important issue >> and is not only a bystander. >> >> There still seems to be a big lack of understanding what working here >> at Apache is all about. >> >> >> >> Bernd >> >