incubator-bluesky-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "Bernd Fondermann" <bernd.fonderm...@googlemail.com>
Subject Re: how do we deal with list.h
Date Tue, 02 Sep 2008 06:41:44 GMT
By the way, another question: You are signing your mail with 'Bowen'
while your from address reads 'Samul Kevin'.

How are these two person interrelated?

Just asking :-)

  Bernd


On Mon, Sep 1, 2008 at 09:42, Samul Kevin <lovesummerf@gmail.com> wrote:
> sorry that i don't understand you appropirately.
> this is the first mail i send to him:
> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
> From: Samul Kevin <lovesummerf@gmail.com>
> Date: 2008-8-22 13:37
> Subject: consulting about the license of stlport
> To: "consulting@stlport.com" <consulting@stlport.com>
>
>
>  hi,our group is scratching a project which is incubating by Apache
> Software Foundation.However,the c++ libarary what we are using (accordrance
> with GPL) collide with Apache Software License.Thus we have to change the
> libarary.
>  After browsing stlport license,i found that it might NOT collide with
> ASL.So i write this letter to confirm if it's totally ok when we use stlport
> under ASL. Appriciate your help.Thks
>
>
> Sincerely yours
>
> Bowen
>
> and this is his reply:
> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
> From: Boris Fomitchev <boris@stlport.com>
> Date: 2008-8-23 4:26
> Subject: Re: consulting about the license of stlport
> To: Samul Kevin <lovesummerf@gmail.com>
> Cc: "consulting@stlport.com" <consulting@stlport.com>
>
> Yes, sure - STLport license does not collide with ASL.
>
> Best,
> -Boris.
>
> Then you ,Bernd,brought out the two questions about the relicense problem.I
> had to say,i didn't quite get it at first time.Not until Jiangshan showed me
> the importance of the license problem did realized it really of account to
> make these license things clear.So i wrote to Boris the second letter,and i
> quoted your question in the letter:
> I feel terribly sorry that i don't make my question in detail.the mentors of
> our project wondered that " What license has stlport and can/will it be
> relicensed to ASL?"
>  we used c++ stl which obeys the GPL license.Unfortunately,it's in the
> excluded catagory of Apache license.So we had to find another c++
> stl.Somebody told us STLPORT is good and may be appropiate to our project.So
> i have to make it clear that if the license of STLPORT can be relicensed to
> ASL.
> this is the license of ASL
> http://apache.org/licenses/LICENSE-2.0
> this is the Third-Party Licensing Policy,i wanna know that whether the
> STLPORT lisence belongs to the authorized catagory.
> http://apache.org/legal/3party.html
>
> appriciate your help
>
> sincerely yours
>
> Bowen
>
>    He have't answered it yet. i don't know if it's the question you wanna
> us to resolve.It's true that we do have some communication problem and i
> think the only way to fix it is to communicate MORE.So don't cherish your
> critics,just bring them on^_^.
>
>
> 2008/9/1, Bernd Fondermann <bernd.fondermann@googlemail.com>:
>>
>> On Mon, Sep 1, 2008 at 03:44, Samul Kevin <lovesummerf@gmail.com> wrote:
>> > i wrote to the author to confirm that.waiting for the answer now^_^
>>
>> As said before, it is good practice to copy the list with what you
>> wrote him and copy his answer to the list, too.
>> So everyone can actually take part in deal with this important issue
>> and is not only a bystander.
>>
>> There still seems to be a big lack of understanding what working here
>> at Apache is all about.
>>
>>
>>
>> Bernd
>>
>

Mime
View raw message