incubator-bluesky-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "Samul Kevin" <lovesumm...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: how do we deal with list.h
Date Tue, 02 Sep 2008 06:58:28 GMT
you mean this place ? * *legal-discuss-subscribe@apache.org
i will try to check it out.


2008/9/2, Bernd Fondermann <bernd.fondermann@googlemail.com>:
>
> On Mon, Sep 1, 2008 at 09:42, Samul Kevin <lovesummerf@gmail.com> wrote:
> > sorry that i don't understand you appropirately.
> > this is the first mail i send to him:
>
> Thanks for sharing this :-)
>
> However, when determining if a license is compatible with the ASL we
> do not trust external people, which are often not  familiar with how
> we deal with licenses. There is the legal-discuss mailing list here at
> Apache where these kinds of problems are discussed.
>
> Also, your mentors should be familiar with Apache licensing. Please
> ask them for more advice or go to legal-discuss.
>
> Bernd
>
> > ---------- Forwarded message ----------
> > From: Samul Kevin <lovesummerf@gmail.com>
> > Date: 2008-8-22 13:37
> > Subject: consulting about the license of stlport
> > To: "consulting@stlport.com" <consulting@stlport.com>
> >
> >
> >  hi,our group is scratching a project which is incubating by Apache
> > Software Foundation.However,the c++ libarary what we are using
> (accordrance
> > with GPL) collide with Apache Software License.Thus we have to change the
> > libarary.
> >  After browsing stlport license,i found that it might NOT collide with
> > ASL.So i write this letter to confirm if it's totally ok when we use
> stlport
> > under ASL. Appriciate your help.Thks
> >
> >
> > Sincerely yours
> >
> > Bowen
> >
> > and this is his reply:
> > ---------- Forwarded message ----------
> > From: Boris Fomitchev <boris@stlport.com>
> > Date: 2008-8-23 4:26
> > Subject: Re: consulting about the license of stlport
> > To: Samul Kevin <lovesummerf@gmail.com>
> > Cc: "consulting@stlport.com" <consulting@stlport.com>
> >
> > Yes, sure - STLport license does not collide with ASL.
> >
> > Best,
> > -Boris.
> >
> > Then you ,Bernd,brought out the two questions about the relicense
> problem.I
> > had to say,i didn't quite get it at first time.Not until Jiangshan showed
> me
> > the importance of the license problem did realized it really of account
> to
> > make these license things clear.So i wrote to Boris the second letter,and
> i
> > quoted your question in the letter:
> > I feel terribly sorry that i don't make my question in detail.the mentors
> of
> > our project wondered that " What license has stlport and can/will it be
> > relicensed to ASL?"
> >  we used c++ stl which obeys the GPL license.Unfortunately,it's in the
> > excluded catagory of Apache license.So we had to find another c++
> > stl.Somebody told us STLPORT is good and may be appropiate to our
> project.So
> > i have to make it clear that if the license of STLPORT can be relicensed
> to
> > ASL.
> > this is the license of ASL
> > http://apache.org/licenses/LICENSE-2.0
> > this is the Third-Party Licensing Policy,i wanna know that whether the
> > STLPORT lisence belongs to the authorized catagory.
> > http://apache.org/legal/3party.html
> >
> > appriciate your help
> >
> > sincerely yours
> >
> > Bowen
> >
> >    He have't answered it yet. i don't know if it's the question you wanna
> > us to resolve.It's true that we do have some communication problem and i
> > think the only way to fix it is to communicate MORE.So don't cherish your
> > critics,just bring them on^_^.
> >
> >
> > 2008/9/1, Bernd Fondermann <bernd.fondermann@googlemail.com>:
> >>
> >> On Mon, Sep 1, 2008 at 03:44, Samul Kevin <lovesummerf@gmail.com>
> wrote:
> >> > i wrote to the author to confirm that.waiting for the answer now^_^
> >>
> >> As said before, it is good practice to copy the list with what you
> >> wrote him and copy his answer to the list, too.
> >> So everyone can actually take part in deal with this important issue
> >> and is not only a bystander.
> >>
> >> There still seems to be a big lack of understanding what working here
> >> at Apache is all about.
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> Bernd
> >>
> >
>

Mime
  • Unnamed multipart/alternative (inline, None, 0 bytes)
View raw message