Mailing-List: contact bloodhound-dev-help@incubator.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: bloodhound-dev@incubator.apache.org
Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of joachim.dreimann@wandisco.com
 designates 74.125.82.49 as permitted sender)
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: 
 <CAPt9QwSb5qLYbNBqAUeakL8adZPXrBvgD2YS7k_htdrQ7dTCoA@mail.gmail.com>
References: <058.80898935e468694e317eee58cd464731@incubator.apache.org>
	<073.95666c54b47948117966899b9d4719b9@incubator.apache.org>
	<CAPt9QwSb5qLYbNBqAUeakL8adZPXrBvgD2YS7k_htdrQ7dTCoA@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 25 Mar 2013 17:34:43 +0000
Message-ID: 
 <CAKoya93bsBm5bDC-8KjFKjoXX38mhv0pkhX4O0HHGzRK+GQJvg@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [Apache Bloodhound] #185: Typeahead for usernames on 'assign to'
 fields
From: Joachim Dreimann <joachim.dreimann@wandisco.com>
To: "bloodhound-dev@incubator.apache.org"
 <bloodhound-dev@incubator.apache.org>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=f46d043be13068438f04d8c338f4

--f46d043be13068438f04d8c338f4
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1

On 25 March 2013 17:24, Ryan Ollos <ryan.ollos@wandisco.com> wrote:

> On Mon, Mar 25, 2013 at 8:47 AM, Apache Bloodhound <
> bloodhound-dev@incubator.apache.org> wrote:
>
> > #185: Typeahead for usernames on 'assign to' fields
> > --------------------------+--------------------
> >   Reporter:  jdreimann    |      Owner:  nobody
> >       Type:  enhancement  |     Status:  new
> >   Priority:  minor        |  Milestone:
> >  Component:  ui design    |    Version:
> > Resolution:               |   Keywords:  gsoc
> > --------------------------+--------------------
> >
> > Comment (by jdreimann):
> >
> >  Replying to [comment:3 olemis]:
> >  I've removed the GSoC tag because a solution to this already exists (see
> >  gjm's coment).
> >
> > --
> > Ticket URL: <https://issues.apache.org/bloodhound/ticket/185#comment:4>
> > Apache Bloodhound <https://issues.apache.org/bloodhound/>
> > The Apache Bloodhound (incubating) issue tracker
> >
>
> The AutocompleteUsersPlugin needs some work to make it compatible with
> recent versions of jQuery. A patch was recently submitted that fixes most
> of the issues, but it needs to be refactored to eliminate a huge amount of
> JS code duplication. After I pull that patch in, we could start testing the
> plugin with Bloodhound. I could keep that on my near-term TODO list, and
> maybe have it ready for inclusion in Release 6. Thoughts?
>

It's fairly low priority in my opinion, but if it's easy and quick for you
to do, sure!

-- 
Joe Dreimann | *User Experience Designer* | WANdisco<http://www.wandisco.com/>

@jdreimann <https://twitter.com/jdreimann>

--f46d043be13068438f04d8c338f4--