Mailing-List: contact bloodhound-dev-help@incubator.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: bloodhound-dev@incubator.apache.org
Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of joachim.dreimann@wandisco.com
 designates 74.125.82.47 as permitted sender)
Subject: Re: Incubator PMC/Board report for Mar 2013 ([ppmc])
References: <20130304151711.55674DDDD@minotaur.apache.org>
 <5134BF72.6060501@wandisco.com> <5134C49F.7070009@wandisco.com>
 <CAEZ-ge74d7QOEnk-GuHkYqyxMygUwN0cwdkKtNJ_zLzk1+wLRg@mail.gmail.com>
 <51361BEE.30801@wandisco.com>
 <CAKoya93B9+Esi=fCJ=U9d6RL8X26b1Msg=AMhvRi_=KwXUkfWg@mail.gmail.com>
 <51374F7B.7070502@wandisco.com> <513752D7.50706@wandisco.com>
 <51376E4B.1020705@wandisco.com>
From: Joe Dreimann <joachim.dreimann@wandisco.com>
Content-Type: text/plain;
	charset=utf-8
In-Reply-To: <51376E4B.1020705@wandisco.com>
Message-Id: <C710B07A-02C3-4127-9461-D80A3F0584A0@wandisco.com>
Date: Wed, 6 Mar 2013 16:49:21 +0000
To: "bloodhound-dev@incubator.apache.org"
 <bloodhound-dev@incubator.apache.org>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Mime-Version: 1.0 (1.0)

(I have requested the permissions earlier today)

________________________
@jdreimann - Twitter
Sent from my phone

On 6 Mar 2013, at 16:26, Gary Martin <gary.martin@wandisco.com> wrote:

> Turns out that Joe was lacking the permissions after all so I have sorted i=
t out now. I believe there is still be time to put in any updates if anyone h=
as anything else for us to mention.
>=20
> Cheers,
>    Gary
>=20
>=20
> On 06/03/13 14:29, Gary Martin wrote:
>> Yes, I like it too. I was going to let Joe put it in as I think he has th=
e relevant permissions.
>>=20
>> Cheers,
>>    Gary
>>=20
>> On 06/03/13 14:15, Branko =C4=8Cibej wrote:
>>> I like Joe's proposal. Why isn't it in the Incubator wiki yet? :)
>>>=20
>>> -- Brane
>>>=20
>>> On 05.03.2013 20:43, Joachim Dreimann wrote:
>>>> I think we should be more direct in what our goals are, so here is my
>>>> suggestion for the report:
>>>>=20
>>>> We're hoping to graduate soon, potentially before the next report. Whil=
e
>>>> growing our community further continues to be important, we have seen
>>>> more outside interest recently. This addresses the only barrier to
>>>> graduation raised after the December2012 report.
>>>> We have further prepared by completing the PODLINGNAMESEARCH.
>>>>=20
>>>> The project now has two online demo instances running of Apache Bloodho=
und,
>>>> one of which shows the current state of the trunk branch [
>>>> http://bh-demo1.apache.org ] and providing a first implementation of th=
e
>>>> new search functionality, responsive layout and multi-product architect=
ure
>>>> that has been developed. Together these represent the main strands of w=
hat
>>>> Apache Bloodhound set out to achieve. Unfortunately, we do not yet have=
 the
>>>> ability to make use of the repository browser, which was something that=
 was
>>>> brought up in the previous report.
>>>>=20
>>>> We added two new committers to the project in January. We have also see=
n
>>>> more interest in the project from a number of channels including irc an=
d
>>>> the dev mailing list which we are, as ever, hoping to convert into grow=
th
>>>> of the developer community and continue to improve upon diversity.
>>>>=20
>>>>=20
>>>> On 5 March 2013 16:23, Gary Martin <gary.martin@wandisco.com> wrote:
>>>>=20
>>>>> On 04/03/13 16:06, Gary Martin wrote:
>>>>>=20
>>>>>> On 4 March 2013 15:58, Branko =C4=8Cibej <brane@wandisco.com <mailto:=

>>>>>> brane@wandisco.com>> wrote:
>>>>>>=20
>>>>>>     On 04.03.2013 16:36, Gary Martin wrote:
>>>>>>     > OK, I think we get the hint.
>>>>>>     >
>>>>>>     > If nobody has volunteered to write up the report before I do, I=

>>>>>>     should
>>>>>>     > be able to get onto it tomorrow.
>>>>>>     >
>>>>>>     > The main things that spring to mind at the moment is that over t=
he
>>>>>>     > last 3 months we have completed the namesearch which, aside fro=
m our
>>>>>>     > decision over whether we have achieved enough diversity, pretty=
 much
>>>>>>     > clears the way for graduation.
>>>>>>     >
>>>>>>     > We can also add the creation of demo servers with lots of help f=
rom
>>>>>>     > Gavin to completed infrastructure requests but we are still
>>>>>>     waiting on
>>>>>>     > a means to effectively connect our issues.apache.org/bloodhound=

>>>>>> <http://issues.apache.org/**bloodhound<http://issues.apache.org/blood=
hound>>
>>>>>> to our
>>>>>>=20
>>>>>>     > area of subversion over NFS, or any other solution. This was
>>>>>>     raised in
>>>>>>     > the December2012 report and I am not aware of any significant
>>>>>>     progress.
>>>>>>     >
>>>>>>     > Any more upbeat news to report will be good too.
>>>>>>=20
>>>>>>     We've seen some outside interest in the project, at least on IRC;=
 not
>>>>>>     much, but it's a start.
>>>>>>=20
>>>>>>     I think we may as well announce that there will be a community vo=
te on
>>>>>>     graduation readiness soon -- i.e., I think we can start it right n=
ow.
>>>>>>=20
>>>>>>=20
>>>>>>=20
>>>>>> Yes, it would be good to get a decision from the community so that so=
unds
>>>>>> like a good plan to me.
>>>>>>=20
>>>>>> Cheers,
>>>>>>     Gary
>>>>> Hi,
>>>>>=20
>>>>> I've just thrown this together. I'll add this to the incubator report s=
oon
>>>>> to use as a starting point unless anyone thinks that I have not been u=
pbeat
>>>>> enough again!
>>>>>=20
>>>>>    Three most important issues to address in the move towards graduati=
on:
>>>>>=20
>>>>>    1. Community growth/diversification
>>>>>    2.
>>>>>    3.
>>>>>=20
>>>>>    Since the last report, three months ago, Bloodhound has completed
>>>>>    its PODLINGNAMESEARCH which aside from issues of
>>>>>    diversity was the final item to consider prior to graduation. The
>>>>>    Bloodhound community has been discussing the
>>>>>    issueof graduation following positive comments following the
>>>>>    Decemeber2012 report and the community vote has now
>>>>>    begun.
>>>>>=20
>>>>>    The project now has demos running of Apache Bloodhound, one of whic=
h
>>>>>    shows the current state of the trunk branch
>>>>>    andproviding a demonstration of the new search functionality that
>>>>>    has been developed. Unfortunately, we do not yet
>>>>>    haveability to make use of the repository browser, which was
>>>>>    something that was brought up in the previous report.
>>>>>=20
>>>>>    We added two new committers to the project in January. We have also=

>>>>>    seen more interest in the project from a number
>>>>>    of channels including irc and the dev mailing list which weare, as
>>>>>    ever, hoping to convert into growth of the
>>>>>    developer community and continue to improve upon diversity.
>>>>>=20
>>>>> The questions that we are meant to answer (currently listed in our ent=
ry
>>>>> on the wiki page) are:
>>>>>=20
>>>>>    Any issues that the Incubator PMC (IPMC) or ASF Board wish/need to
>>>>>    be aware of?
>>>>>    How has the community developed since the last report?
>>>>>    How has the project developed since the last report?
>>>>>=20
>>>>> Cheers,
>>>>>     Gary
>=20