incubator-bloodhound-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Ryan Ollos <ryan.ol...@wandisco.com>
Subject Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Bloodhound 0.5 (incubating)
Date Wed, 13 Mar 2013 20:53:20 GMT
On Wed, Mar 13, 2013 at 1:08 PM, Matevž Bradač <matevzb@gmail.com> wrote:

>
> On 13. Mar, 2013, at 18:02, Ryan Ollos wrote:
>
> > On Mon, Mar 11, 2013 at 2:50 AM, Ryan Ollos <ryan.ollos@wandisco.com>
> wrote:
> >
> >> Hi everyone,
> >>
> >> I would like to initiate the vote for releasing Apache Bloodhound 0.5
> >> (incubating).
> >>
> >> Please find the change log for this proposed release below:
> >>
> >> * Implemented Bootstrap templates for the repository browser, log viewer
> >> and attachment pages.
> >> * Upgraded Bootstrap to version 2.3.1.
> >> * Upgraded Trac to version 1.0.1.
> >> * Various bug fixes and enhancements.
> >>
> >> * Not fixed for this release:
> >>   * No major outstanding issues
> >>
> >> For this release, the archive differs from the tag in that the Trac
> >> "contrib" directory has been removed from the archive. The files
> >> in that directory currently lack license headers. We are working
> >> with the Trac team to clarify the licenses under which the contrib files
> >> are released:
> >> https://issues.apache.org/bloodhound/ticket/273
> >>
> >> The release candidate artifacts consist of source release as a tar.gz
> >> archive along with the associated MD5 and GPG signature.
> >> These can be found at:
> >> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/incubator/bloodhound/
> >>
> >> The archive is based on the tag:
> >> http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/incubator/bloodhound/tags/0.5-incubating
> >>
> >> Please vote:
> >> [ ] +1 Release this package as Apache Bloodhound 0.5
> >> [ ] +0 Don't care
> >> [ ] -1 Do not release this package (please explain)
> >>
> >> The vote is open for 72 hours and, if successful, will be followed by a
> >> vote on general@incubator for a further 72 hours.
> >>
> >
> > Matevz, what should we say about the responsive layout for this release?
> I
> > have not tracked that work closely enough to be able to summarize it
> myself.
>
> I think we can at least mention it. The main implementation was
> finished (see #217), and what is left is more or less fine-tuning
> and bug fixing.
> Another reason for mentioning would be to get the user feedback on
> usage with tablets and phones. Beforehand the experience was quite
> cumbersome (lots of zooming in/out, panning etc.), with 0.5(.1) this
> will have been addressed to a large extent.
>

I'll add a very general statement then, such as "Added responsive layout
support."

Mime
  • Unnamed multipart/alternative (inline, None, 0 bytes)
View raw message