incubator-bloodhound-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Andrej Golcov <and...@digiverse.si>
Subject Re: Query Builder (Search / Custom Query)
Date Fri, 15 Mar 2013 21:44:27 GMT
I think, we also mentioned possibility to add/select columns for grid view.

Regards, Andrej

On 14 March 2013 17:01, Joachim Dreimann <joachim.dreimann@wandisco.com> wrote:
> This is my suggestion for the Query Builder UI in Grid view / batch edit
> mode:
> https://issues.apache.org/bloodhound/attachment/wiki/BloodhoundSearch/search%20grid%20view.png
>
> I believe this reflects all the previous comments made on this, but I may
> have missed something. Please let me know if I did and I will update it
> shortly.
>
> Cheers,
> Joe
>
>
> On 1 March 2013 11:23, Gary Martin <gary.martin@wandisco.com> wrote:
>
>> On 01/03/13 10:59, Andrej Golcov wrote:
>>
>>> I'm not clear on what this means in practice - I had the impression that
>>>> both Amazon and (current) Bloodhound show the number of items found under
>>>> the current constraints (query term, other facets) per facet.
>>>>
>>> Actually, Amazon search shows counts for Brands out of search scope.
>>> For example, using your sample from url above, if you filter by
>>> Sumsung brand, you see also other brands and counts. Ok, we are to
>>> deep in technical details here.
>>>
>>
>> It is a good point though. The advantage of allowing this is that we get
>> the ability to do or relations within each category but, unless there is
>> some kind of shortcut to the information in whoosh, it would mean multiple
>> searches.
>>
>> The ebay solution mentioned in Andrej's reply also shows another means to
>> create the OR condition by providing a popup to show just one category of
>> facets which would be a search that could be done on demand. They also do
>> not bother with showing the number of results under each category except
>> within the popup.
>>
>> I think I prefer the form that Joe proposes for giving more information
>> but it may be worth compromising.
>>
>>
>>
>>>    - Number of products can be quite big and facet filter IMHO is not
>>>>> the best way to filter product specific resource.  I would suggest
>>>>> having an combo or dropdown with product selector. Something similar
>>>>> to projects in http://youtrack.jetbrains.com/**issues<http://youtrack.jetbrains.com/issues>or
"computer
>>>>> components" dropdown in amazon link that you provided. The product
>>>>> selector can be  part of top navigation and used not only by search.
>>>>>
>>>>>  Seems reasonable, although I would suggest that Chosen has a better
>>>> Multi
>>>> Select style:
>>>> http://harvesthq.github.com/**chosen/<http://harvesthq.github.com/chosen/>
>>>>
>>> +1.
>>>
>>
>> Looks good to me too.
>>
>>
>>
>>>    - search breadcrumbs:
>>>>>     - What does link on "Search >" on the left of breadcrumb?
>>>>>
>>>>>  http://[bloodhound]/search (incl current search box query)
>>>>
>>> Ack
>>>
>>>      - I suppose that click on "Ticket >" link in the breadcrumbs resets
>>>>> all filters except search box query? Does "Clear filters" link
>>>>> duplicates the similar functionality?
>>>>>
>>>>>  My thinking was actually that it removes all filters other than the
>>>> one for
>>>> Type.
>>>>
>>> I like how ebay represents search breadcrumbs, for example, check this
>>> http://goo.gl/jHZPQ
>>> It is very clear that click on search breadcrumb deletes a particular
>>> filter.
>>>
>>
>> This was closer to what I was thinking we would want but it could be
>> duplicating the ability to delete a filter from the side menu. The current
>> design is suggestive of a positional breadcrumb which may not be so
>> appropriate here (though currently consistent with other uses).
>>
>>
>>
>>>    - I think about "View as" as a part of toolbar below of search
>>>>> breadcrumb. The toolbar may include select all/none methods, batch
>>>>> operations etc.
>>>>>
>>>>>  Yep. Those options shouldn't be visible though unless they actually
>>>> apply.
>>>> See Gmail's batch operations buttons for inspiration.
>>>>
>>> +1
>>>
>>>  - Will we support possibility to specify sorting in free text search
>>>>> view?
>>>>>
>>>> No - If our sorting of results isn't good enough for the majority of
>>>> cases
>>>> we should probably fix that before we ask users to figure it out for
>>>> themselves.
>>>>
>>> Ok.
>>> Just one note: grid view already supports sorting of columns similar
>>> how it is done in Trac custom queries.
>>> I think we can later provide kind of sort selector, at least for grid
>>> view.
>>>
>>
>> Sounds good.
>>
>> Cheers,
>>     Gary
>>
>
>
>
> --
> Joe Dreimann
> UX Designer | WANdisco <http://www.wandisco.com/>
> *
> *
> *Transform your software development department. Register for a free SVN
> HealthCheck <http://go.wandisco.com/HealthCheck-Sig.html> *

Mime
View raw message