incubator-bloodhound-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Joe Dreimann <joachim.dreim...@wandisco.com>
Subject Re: Incubator PMC/Board report for Mar 2013 ([ppmc])
Date Wed, 06 Mar 2013 16:49:21 GMT
(I have requested the permissions earlier today)

________________________
@jdreimann - Twitter
Sent from my phone

On 6 Mar 2013, at 16:26, Gary Martin <gary.martin@wandisco.com> wrote:

> Turns out that Joe was lacking the permissions after all so I have sorted it out now.
I believe there is still be time to put in any updates if anyone has anything else for us
to mention.
> 
> Cheers,
>    Gary
> 
> 
> On 06/03/13 14:29, Gary Martin wrote:
>> Yes, I like it too. I was going to let Joe put it in as I think he has the relevant
permissions.
>> 
>> Cheers,
>>    Gary
>> 
>> On 06/03/13 14:15, Branko ─îibej wrote:
>>> I like Joe's proposal. Why isn't it in the Incubator wiki yet? :)
>>> 
>>> -- Brane
>>> 
>>> On 05.03.2013 20:43, Joachim Dreimann wrote:
>>>> I think we should be more direct in what our goals are, so here is my
>>>> suggestion for the report:
>>>> 
>>>> We're hoping to graduate soon, potentially before the next report. While
>>>> growing our community further continues to be important, we have seen
>>>> more outside interest recently. This addresses the only barrier to
>>>> graduation raised after the December2012 report.
>>>> We have further prepared by completing the PODLINGNAMESEARCH.
>>>> 
>>>> The project now has two online demo instances running of Apache Bloodhound,
>>>> one of which shows the current state of the trunk branch [
>>>> http://bh-demo1.apache.org ] and providing a first implementation of the
>>>> new search functionality, responsive layout and multi-product architecture
>>>> that has been developed. Together these represent the main strands of what
>>>> Apache Bloodhound set out to achieve. Unfortunately, we do not yet have the
>>>> ability to make use of the repository browser, which was something that was
>>>> brought up in the previous report.
>>>> 
>>>> We added two new committers to the project in January. We have also seen
>>>> more interest in the project from a number of channels including irc and
>>>> the dev mailing list which we are, as ever, hoping to convert into growth
>>>> of the developer community and continue to improve upon diversity.
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> On 5 March 2013 16:23, Gary Martin <gary.martin@wandisco.com> wrote:
>>>> 
>>>>> On 04/03/13 16:06, Gary Martin wrote:
>>>>> 
>>>>>> On 4 March 2013 15:58, Branko ─îibej <brane@wandisco.com <mailto:
>>>>>> brane@wandisco.com>> wrote:
>>>>>> 
>>>>>>     On 04.03.2013 16:36, Gary Martin wrote:
>>>>>>     > OK, I think we get the hint.
>>>>>>     >
>>>>>>     > If nobody has volunteered to write up the report before
I do, I
>>>>>>     should
>>>>>>     > be able to get onto it tomorrow.
>>>>>>     >
>>>>>>     > The main things that spring to mind at the moment is that
over the
>>>>>>     > last 3 months we have completed the namesearch which, aside
from our
>>>>>>     > decision over whether we have achieved enough diversity,
pretty much
>>>>>>     > clears the way for graduation.
>>>>>>     >
>>>>>>     > We can also add the creation of demo servers with lots of
help from
>>>>>>     > Gavin to completed infrastructure requests but we are still
>>>>>>     waiting on
>>>>>>     > a means to effectively connect our issues.apache.org/bloodhound
>>>>>> <http://issues.apache.org/**bloodhound<http://issues.apache.org/bloodhound>>
>>>>>> to our
>>>>>> 
>>>>>>     > area of subversion over NFS, or any other solution. This
was
>>>>>>     raised in
>>>>>>     > the December2012 report and I am not aware of any significant
>>>>>>     progress.
>>>>>>     >
>>>>>>     > Any more upbeat news to report will be good too.
>>>>>> 
>>>>>>     We've seen some outside interest in the project, at least on
IRC; not
>>>>>>     much, but it's a start.
>>>>>> 
>>>>>>     I think we may as well announce that there will be a community
vote on
>>>>>>     graduation readiness soon -- i.e., I think we can start it right
now.
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> Yes, it would be good to get a decision from the community so that
sounds
>>>>>> like a good plan to me.
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> Cheers,
>>>>>>     Gary
>>>>> Hi,
>>>>> 
>>>>> I've just thrown this together. I'll add this to the incubator report
soon
>>>>> to use as a starting point unless anyone thinks that I have not been
upbeat
>>>>> enough again!
>>>>> 
>>>>>    Three most important issues to address in the move towards graduation:
>>>>> 
>>>>>    1. Community growth/diversification
>>>>>    2.
>>>>>    3.
>>>>> 
>>>>>    Since the last report, three months ago, Bloodhound has completed
>>>>>    its PODLINGNAMESEARCH which aside from issues of
>>>>>    diversity was the final item to consider prior to graduation. The
>>>>>    Bloodhound community has been discussing the
>>>>>    issueof graduation following positive comments following the
>>>>>    Decemeber2012 report and the community vote has now
>>>>>    begun.
>>>>> 
>>>>>    The project now has demos running of Apache Bloodhound, one of which
>>>>>    shows the current state of the trunk branch
>>>>>    andproviding a demonstration of the new search functionality that
>>>>>    has been developed. Unfortunately, we do not yet
>>>>>    haveability to make use of the repository browser, which was
>>>>>    something that was brought up in the previous report.
>>>>> 
>>>>>    We added two new committers to the project in January. We have also
>>>>>    seen more interest in the project from a number
>>>>>    of channels including irc and the dev mailing list which weare, as
>>>>>    ever, hoping to convert into growth of the
>>>>>    developer community and continue to improve upon diversity.
>>>>> 
>>>>> The questions that we are meant to answer (currently listed in our entry
>>>>> on the wiki page) are:
>>>>> 
>>>>>    Any issues that the Incubator PMC (IPMC) or ASF Board wish/need to
>>>>>    be aware of?
>>>>>    How has the community developed since the last report?
>>>>>    How has the project developed since the last report?
>>>>> 
>>>>> Cheers,
>>>>>     Gary
> 

Mime
View raw message