incubator-bloodhound-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Gary Martin <gary.mar...@wandisco.com>
Subject Re: Incubator PMC/Board report for Mar 2013 ([ppmc])
Date Wed, 06 Mar 2013 16:26:51 GMT
Turns out that Joe was lacking the permissions after all so I have 
sorted it out now. I believe there is still be time to put in any 
updates if anyone has anything else for us to mention.

Cheers,
     Gary


On 06/03/13 14:29, Gary Martin wrote:
> Yes, I like it too. I was going to let Joe put it in as I think he has 
> the relevant permissions.
>
> Cheers,
>     Gary
>
> On 06/03/13 14:15, Branko ─îibej wrote:
>> I like Joe's proposal. Why isn't it in the Incubator wiki yet? :)
>>
>> -- Brane
>>
>> On 05.03.2013 20:43, Joachim Dreimann wrote:
>>> I think we should be more direct in what our goals are, so here is my
>>> suggestion for the report:
>>>
>>> We're hoping to graduate soon, potentially before the next report. 
>>> While
>>> growing our community further continues to be important, we have seen
>>> more outside interest recently. This addresses the only barrier to
>>> graduation raised after the December2012 report.
>>> We have further prepared by completing the PODLINGNAMESEARCH.
>>>
>>> The project now has two online demo instances running of Apache 
>>> Bloodhound,
>>> one of which shows the current state of the trunk branch [
>>> http://bh-demo1.apache.org ] and providing a first implementation of 
>>> the
>>> new search functionality, responsive layout and multi-product 
>>> architecture
>>> that has been developed. Together these represent the main strands 
>>> of what
>>> Apache Bloodhound set out to achieve. Unfortunately, we do not yet 
>>> have the
>>> ability to make use of the repository browser, which was something 
>>> that was
>>> brought up in the previous report.
>>>
>>> We added two new committers to the project in January. We have also 
>>> seen
>>> more interest in the project from a number of channels including irc 
>>> and
>>> the dev mailing list which we are, as ever, hoping to convert into 
>>> growth
>>> of the developer community and continue to improve upon diversity.
>>>
>>>
>>> On 5 March 2013 16:23, Gary Martin <gary.martin@wandisco.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>> On 04/03/13 16:06, Gary Martin wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> On 4 March 2013 15:58, Branko ─îibej <brane@wandisco.com <mailto:
>>>>> brane@wandisco.com>> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>      On 04.03.2013 16:36, Gary Martin wrote:
>>>>>      > OK, I think we get the hint.
>>>>>      >
>>>>>      > If nobody has volunteered to write up the report before I 
>>>>> do, I
>>>>>      should
>>>>>      > be able to get onto it tomorrow.
>>>>>      >
>>>>>      > The main things that spring to mind at the moment is that 
>>>>> over the
>>>>>      > last 3 months we have completed the namesearch which, aside

>>>>> from our
>>>>>      > decision over whether we have achieved enough diversity, 
>>>>> pretty much
>>>>>      > clears the way for graduation.
>>>>>      >
>>>>>      > We can also add the creation of demo servers with lots of 
>>>>> help from
>>>>>      > Gavin to completed infrastructure requests but we are still
>>>>>      waiting on
>>>>>      > a means to effectively connect our 
>>>>> issues.apache.org/bloodhound
>>>>> <http://issues.apache.org/**bloodhound<http://issues.apache.org/bloodhound>>
>>>>> to our
>>>>>
>>>>>      > area of subversion over NFS, or any other solution. This was
>>>>>      raised in
>>>>>      > the December2012 report and I am not aware of any significant
>>>>>      progress.
>>>>>      >
>>>>>      > Any more upbeat news to report will be good too.
>>>>>
>>>>>      We've seen some outside interest in the project, at least on 
>>>>> IRC; not
>>>>>      much, but it's a start.
>>>>>
>>>>>      I think we may as well announce that there will be a 
>>>>> community vote on
>>>>>      graduation readiness soon -- i.e., I think we can start it 
>>>>> right now.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Yes, it would be good to get a decision from the community so that 
>>>>> sounds
>>>>> like a good plan to me.
>>>>>
>>>>> Cheers,
>>>>>      Gary
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>> Hi,
>>>>
>>>> I've just thrown this together. I'll add this to the incubator 
>>>> report soon
>>>> to use as a starting point unless anyone thinks that I have not 
>>>> been upbeat
>>>> enough again!
>>>>
>>>>     Three most important issues to address in the move towards 
>>>> graduation:
>>>>
>>>>     1. Community growth/diversification
>>>>     2.
>>>>     3.
>>>>
>>>>     Since the last report, three months ago, Bloodhound has completed
>>>>     its PODLINGNAMESEARCH which aside from issues of
>>>>     diversity was the final item to consider prior to graduation. The
>>>>     Bloodhound community has been discussing the
>>>>     issueof graduation following positive comments following the
>>>>     Decemeber2012 report and the community vote has now
>>>>     begun.
>>>>
>>>>     The project now has demos running of Apache Bloodhound, one of 
>>>> which
>>>>     shows the current state of the trunk branch
>>>>     andproviding a demonstration of the new search functionality that
>>>>     has been developed. Unfortunately, we do not yet
>>>>     haveability to make use of the repository browser, which was
>>>>     something that was brought up in the previous report.
>>>>
>>>>     We added two new committers to the project in January. We have 
>>>> also
>>>>     seen more interest in the project from a number
>>>>     of channels including irc and the dev mailing list which weare, as
>>>>     ever, hoping to convert into growth of the
>>>>     developer community and continue to improve upon diversity.
>>>>
>>>> The questions that we are meant to answer (currently listed in our 
>>>> entry
>>>> on the wiki page) are:
>>>>
>>>>     Any issues that the Incubator PMC (IPMC) or ASF Board wish/need to
>>>>     be aware of?
>>>>     How has the community developed since the last report?
>>>>     How has the project developed since the last report?
>>>>
>>>> Cheers,
>>>>      Gary
>>>>
>>>>
>>
>


Mime
View raw message