Mailing-List: contact bloodhound-dev-help@incubator.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: bloodhound-dev@incubator.apache.org
Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of olemis@gmail.com designates
 209.85.223.178 as permitted sender)
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <510FE7E2.6090004@wandisco.com>
References: <510FE7E2.6090004@wandisco.com>
Date: Mon, 4 Feb 2013 12:24:22 -0500
Message-ID: 
 <CAGMZAuNhFRoXrEmXrNW2TrdwMZ=ut+28aHEj=HKW45QaGGRsPg@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] Bloodhound Graduation
From: Olemis Lang <olemis@gmail.com>
To: bloodhound-dev@incubator.apache.org
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1

On 2/4/13, Gary Martin <gary.martin@wandisco.com> wrote:
> Hi,
>

:)

[...]
>
>  2. Checking Bloodhound is a suitable name (see
>
[...]
> This appears to be partly backed up by the following thread from our
> after our last report:
>
>     http://markmail.org/thread/wvnk4w6z7e25rx2h
>
> note in particular Brane's reply to Jukka's message to see the frank
> evaluation of the circumstances at the time.
>
[...]

On the subject of bloodhound.com , well ... I checked myself
bloodhound.* domains before (first time one year ago , last one just a
few months later) and they were just about puppets and others only
contained non-sense ads .

What shall we do about that ? Is it a major issue ?

-- 
Regards,

Olemis.