incubator-bloodhound-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "Gavin McDonald" <ga...@16degrees.com.au>
Subject RE: Demo VM ready (was: RE: Public demo instance hosted by third party)
Date Sun, 10 Feb 2013 22:27:33 GMT


> -----Original Message-----
> From: Andrej Golcov [mailto:andrej@digiverse.si]
> Sent: Thursday, 7 February 2013 2:37 AM
> To: bloodhound-dev@incubator.apache.org
> Cc: gavin@16degrees.com.au
> Subject: Re: Demo VM ready (was: RE: Public demo instance hosted by third
> party)
> 
> Hi Gavin,
> 
> Please also add my name on the list.
> SSH pub key is in ldap.
> 

Sorry for delay, you should now have ssh access to 
bloodhound-vm2.aapche.org

If you need sudo, you'll need to set up orthrus (opie) first.

See s.apache.org/opie 

HTH

Gav...

> Regards, Andrej
> 
> On 6 February 2013 10:55, Matevž Bradač <matevzb@gmail.com> wrote:
> > Hi Gavin
> >
> > Please add me to the list as well (I already added the ssh pub key).
> >
> > Cheers,
> > matevz
> >
> > On 22. Jan, 2013, at 10:04, Gavin McDonald wrote:
> >
> >> Hi All,
> >>
> >> As promised, a VM is ready to go.
> >>
> >> Currently gjm, mpoole and myself have access.
> >>
> >> Let me know if anyone else in interested in helping to maintain the
> >> demo VM as a whole.
> >>
> >> I'd like to help with the setting up of the Demo Instances, so my
> >> work is done here with my infra hat for now, but will continue on
> >> with my bh hat on if I may.
> >>
> >> Thanks
> >>
> >> Gav...
> >>
> >>
> >>> -----Original Message-----
> >>> From: Gary Martin [mailto:gary.martin@wandisco.com]
> >>> Sent: Friday, 11 January 2013 9:51 PM
> >>> To: bloodhound-dev@incubator.apache.org
> >>> Subject: Re: Public demo instance hosted by third party
> >>>
> >>> On 10/01/13 22:44, Gavin McDonald wrote:
> >>>>
> >>>>> -----Original Message-----
> >>>>> From: Joachim Dreimann [mailto:joachim.dreimann@wandisco.com]
> >>>>> Sent: Friday, 11 January 2013 4:48 AM
> >>>>> To: bloodhound-dev@incubator.apache.org
> >>>>> Subject: Re: Public demo instance hosted by third party
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Indeed I think the ASF VM should be our first priority. I'm
> >>>>> talking about
> >>>> a
> >>>>> temporary solution until then, not an advertising drive.
> >>>>> I recognise that this could be a slippery slope (regarding user
> >>>> perception), but
> >>>>> I feel confident enough that the lack of slope (ie users) is more
> >>>> important at
> >>>>> this point. Hopefully Gary's change to the ticket and comment will
> >>>>> achieve some progress.
> >>>>>
> >>>> I've got my eye on doing this rsn, just  the backlog of projects
> >>>> jumping last minute with the svnpubsub/cms deadlines has kept us
> busy.
> >>>>
> >>>> I will start the VM today.
> >>>>
> >>>> what service urls do you want?
> >>>>
> >>>> I suggest a machine (VM) name of bloodhound-vm2.a.o with service
> >>>> urls of something like bh-demo1.a.o , bh-demo2.a.o etc ?
> >>>
> >>> The VM name is fine. I guess something like bh-demo-<name>.a.o might
> >>> be worth going for but I would also be happy to distinguish the
> >>> demos with something like bh-demo.a.o/<name>/
> >>>
> >>> In case it is helpful to know now, the two demos we expect to start
> >>> with would probably be:
> >>>
> >>>  * current - the latest official release
> >>>  * nightly - the current trunk, obviously rebuilt once a day
> >>>
> >>> I think there was also a suggestion of having any upcoming release
> >>> demoed over the voting period, although we may have to balance any
> >>> benefit of
> >> that
> >>> against the possibility that votes will be made only on the basis of
> >>> such
> >> a
> >>> demo.
> >>>
> >>> Cheers,
> >>>     Gary
> >>
> >


Mime
View raw message