Mailing-List: contact bloodhound-dev-help@incubator.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: bloodhound-dev@incubator.apache.org
Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of olemis@gmail.com designates
 209.85.223.177 as permitted sender)
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: 
 <CAJSKAsg6Hn0pP9bF0K8_FWBQavE7RTGgVedDP+_ff2jq01G9OQ@mail.gmail.com>
References: 
 <CAPt9QwTG0Ew50sJKYKqo1KiHam8S8xOArTfUoxBx8HdUye_FkA@mail.gmail.com>
	<CAJSKAsg6Hn0pP9bF0K8_FWBQavE7RTGgVedDP+_ff2jq01G9OQ@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 8 Jan 2013 11:21:22 -0500
Message-ID: 
 <CAGMZAuNTsZwXvnXEoLAqa5CSB_NhPYoa5maJhg3k+R=b5BUsHw@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: AccountManagerPlugin
From: Olemis Lang <olemis@gmail.com>
To: bloodhound-dev@incubator.apache.org
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

On 1/8/13, Peter Ko=C5=BEelj <peter@digiverse.si> wrote:
> On 3 January 2013 17:01, Ryan Ollos <ryan.ollos@wandisco.com> wrote:
>
[...]
>
>> For now, I just wanted to list some of the features that are on the tabl=
e
>> for upcoming releases, and give the Bloodhound community the chance to
>> comment on what might be most important to tackle for upcoming releases.
>> I
>> will consider focusing my efforts according to whatever feedback I
>> receive.
>>
[...]
>
> There is one thing that I am missing from this list that should probably =
be
> number 1: Bloodhound multiproduct awareness

Accounts / users should be considered global resources , so ... Maybe
permission admin is a suitable target for multi-product awareness .
Nonetheless we don't even have a functional multi-product solution .

I'm not sure either of whether plugin maintainer will be keen to
include contributions aimed at a better integration with Apache=E2=84=A2
Bloodhound . That might take a while (... or not ...) , and if so
=C2=ABnumber 1=C2=BB wouldn't be accurate .

IMO *at this moment* rjollos list has higher priority than
MP-compatibilty , because

  1. we don't have a functional multi-product solution yet ,
     and we should focus on building it and obtain something
     relatively stable , suitable to be released
  2. (1) will take a while ...
  3. items in rjollos list can be improved concurrently and
      consist in enhancements to the domain objects and logic .

Once we have a functional multi-product solution, well , that might change =
.

>
> I will look into both to get an idea what we want/need here.

Good .
:)

It'd be nice too if you could add something in BEP 3 , maybe here [1]_
or elsewhere .

.. [1] Per product permission scheme
        (https://issues.apache.org/bloodhound/wiki/Proposals/BEP-0003#permi=
ssions)

--=20
Regards,

Olemis.

Blog ES: http://simelo-es.blogspot.com/
Blog EN: http://simelo-en.blogspot.com/

Featured article: