incubator-bloodhound-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Peter Koželj <pe...@digiverse.si>
Subject Re: Demo VM ready (was: RE: Public demo instance hosted by third party)
Date Mon, 28 Jan 2013 07:49:43 GMT
Works like a charm!

Thanks,
Peter

On 26 January 2013 08:20, Gavin McDonald <gavin@16degrees.com.au> wrote:

>
>
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Jure Zitnik [mailto:jure@digiverse.si]
> > Sent: Wednesday, 23 January 2013 4:05 AM
> > To: bloodhound-dev@incubator.apache.org
> > Subject: Re: Demo VM ready (was: RE: Public demo instance hosted by third
> > party)
> >
> > On 1/22/13 10:04 AM, Gavin McDonald wrote:
> > > Hi All,
> > >
> > > As promised, a VM is ready to go.
> > >
> > > Currently gjm, mpoole and myself have access.
> > >
> > > Let me know if anyone else in interested in helping to maintain the
> > > demo VM as a whole.
> >
> > I'm interested in helping to maintain the demo VM so please add me to the
> > list.
>
> Please add a ssh pub key to id.apache.org and then try logging in to
> bloodhound-vm2.a.o
>
> Thanks
>
> Gav...
>
> >
> > Cheers,
> > Jure
> >
> >
> > > I'd like to help with the setting up of the Demo Instances, so my work
> > > is done here with my infra hat for now, but will continue on with my
> > > bh hat on if I may.
> > >
> > > Thanks
> > >
> > > Gav...
> > >
> > >
> > >> -----Original Message-----
> > >> From: Gary Martin [mailto:gary.martin@wandisco.com]
> > >> Sent: Friday, 11 January 2013 9:51 PM
> > >> To: bloodhound-dev@incubator.apache.org
> > >> Subject: Re: Public demo instance hosted by third party
> > >>
> > >> On 10/01/13 22:44, Gavin McDonald wrote:
> > >>>> -----Original Message-----
> > >>>> From: Joachim Dreimann [mailto:joachim.dreimann@wandisco.com]
> > >>>> Sent: Friday, 11 January 2013 4:48 AM
> > >>>> To: bloodhound-dev@incubator.apache.org
> > >>>> Subject: Re: Public demo instance hosted by third party
> > >>>>
> > >>>> Indeed I think the ASF VM should be our first priority. I'm talking
> > >>>> about
> > >>> a
> > >>>> temporary solution until then, not an advertising drive.
> > >>>> I recognise that this could be a slippery slope (regarding user
> > >>> perception), but
> > >>>> I feel confident enough that the lack of slope (ie users) is more
> > >>> important at
> > >>>> this point. Hopefully Gary's change to the ticket and comment will
> > >>>> achieve some progress.
> > >>>>
> > >>> I've got my eye on doing this rsn, just  the backlog of projects
> > >>> jumping last minute with the svnpubsub/cms deadlines has kept us
> > busy.
> > >>>
> > >>> I will start the VM today.
> > >>>
> > >>> what service urls do you want?
> > >>>
> > >>> I suggest a machine (VM) name of bloodhound-vm2.a.o with service
> > >>> urls of something like bh-demo1.a.o , bh-demo2.a.o etc ?
> > >> The VM name is fine. I guess something like bh-demo-<name>.a.o might
> > >> be worth going for but I would also be happy to distinguish the demos
> > >> with something like bh-demo.a.o/<name>/
> > >>
> > >> In case it is helpful to know now, the two demos we expect to start
> > >> with would probably be:
> > >>
> > >>    * current - the latest official release
> > >>    * nightly - the current trunk, obviously rebuilt once a day
> > >>
> > >> I think there was also a suggestion of having any upcoming release
> > >> demoed over the voting period, although we may have to balance any
> > >> benefit of
> > > that
> > >> against the possibility that votes will be made only on the basis of
> > >> such
> > > a
> > >> demo.
> > >>
> > >> Cheers,
> > >>       Gary
>
>
>

Mime
  • Unnamed multipart/alternative (inline, None, 0 bytes)
View raw message