incubator-bloodhound-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Peter Koželj <pe...@digiverse.si>
Subject Re: Demo VM ready (was: RE: Public demo instance hosted by third party)
Date Tue, 22 Jan 2013 16:39:22 GMT
Gavin,

you can add me to the list as well.

Regards,
Peter

On 22 January 2013 10:04, Gavin McDonald <gavin@16degrees.com.au> wrote:

> Hi All,
>
> As promised, a VM is ready to go.
>
> Currently gjm, mpoole and myself have access.
>
> Let me know if anyone else in interested in helping to maintain the demo VM
> as a whole.
>
> I'd like to help with the setting up of the Demo Instances, so my work is
> done here with my infra
> hat for now, but will continue on with my bh hat on if I may.
>
> Thanks
>
> Gav...
>
>
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Gary Martin [mailto:gary.martin@wandisco.com]
> > Sent: Friday, 11 January 2013 9:51 PM
> > To: bloodhound-dev@incubator.apache.org
> > Subject: Re: Public demo instance hosted by third party
> >
> > On 10/01/13 22:44, Gavin McDonald wrote:
> > >
> > >> -----Original Message-----
> > >> From: Joachim Dreimann [mailto:joachim.dreimann@wandisco.com]
> > >> Sent: Friday, 11 January 2013 4:48 AM
> > >> To: bloodhound-dev@incubator.apache.org
> > >> Subject: Re: Public demo instance hosted by third party
> > >>
> > >> Indeed I think the ASF VM should be our first priority. I'm talking
> > >> about
> > > a
> > >> temporary solution until then, not an advertising drive.
> > >> I recognise that this could be a slippery slope (regarding user
> > > perception), but
> > >> I feel confident enough that the lack of slope (ie users) is more
> > > important at
> > >> this point. Hopefully Gary's change to the ticket and comment will
> > >> achieve some progress.
> > >>
> > > I've got my eye on doing this rsn, just  the backlog of projects
> > > jumping last minute with the svnpubsub/cms deadlines has kept us busy.
> > >
> > > I will start the VM today.
> > >
> > > what service urls do you want?
> > >
> > > I suggest a machine (VM) name of bloodhound-vm2.a.o with service urls
> > > of something like bh-demo1.a.o , bh-demo2.a.o etc ?
> >
> > The VM name is fine. I guess something like bh-demo-<name>.a.o might be
> > worth going for but I would also be happy to distinguish the demos with
> > something like bh-demo.a.o/<name>/
> >
> > In case it is helpful to know now, the two demos we expect to start with
> > would probably be:
> >
> >   * current - the latest official release
> >   * nightly - the current trunk, obviously rebuilt once a day
> >
> > I think there was also a suggestion of having any upcoming release demoed
> > over the voting period, although we may have to balance any benefit of
> that
> > against the possibility that votes will be made only on the basis of such
> a
> > demo.
> >
> > Cheers,
> >      Gary
>
>

Mime
  • Unnamed multipart/alternative (inline, None, 0 bytes)
View raw message