incubator-bloodhound-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Jure Zitnik <j...@digiverse.si>
Subject Re: Demo VM ready (was: RE: Public demo instance hosted by third party)
Date Tue, 22 Jan 2013 17:35:23 GMT
On 1/22/13 10:04 AM, Gavin McDonald wrote:
> Hi All,
>
> As promised, a VM is ready to go.
>
> Currently gjm, mpoole and myself have access.
>
> Let me know if anyone else in interested in helping to maintain the demo VM
> as a whole.

I'm interested in helping to maintain the demo VM so please add me to 
the list.

Cheers,
Jure


> I'd like to help with the setting up of the Demo Instances, so my work is
> done here with my infra
> hat for now, but will continue on with my bh hat on if I may.
>
> Thanks
>
> Gav...
>
>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: Gary Martin [mailto:gary.martin@wandisco.com]
>> Sent: Friday, 11 January 2013 9:51 PM
>> To: bloodhound-dev@incubator.apache.org
>> Subject: Re: Public demo instance hosted by third party
>>
>> On 10/01/13 22:44, Gavin McDonald wrote:
>>>> -----Original Message-----
>>>> From: Joachim Dreimann [mailto:joachim.dreimann@wandisco.com]
>>>> Sent: Friday, 11 January 2013 4:48 AM
>>>> To: bloodhound-dev@incubator.apache.org
>>>> Subject: Re: Public demo instance hosted by third party
>>>>
>>>> Indeed I think the ASF VM should be our first priority. I'm talking
>>>> about
>>> a
>>>> temporary solution until then, not an advertising drive.
>>>> I recognise that this could be a slippery slope (regarding user
>>> perception), but
>>>> I feel confident enough that the lack of slope (ie users) is more
>>> important at
>>>> this point. Hopefully Gary's change to the ticket and comment will
>>>> achieve some progress.
>>>>
>>> I've got my eye on doing this rsn, just  the backlog of projects
>>> jumping last minute with the svnpubsub/cms deadlines has kept us busy.
>>>
>>> I will start the VM today.
>>>
>>> what service urls do you want?
>>>
>>> I suggest a machine (VM) name of bloodhound-vm2.a.o with service urls
>>> of something like bh-demo1.a.o , bh-demo2.a.o etc ?
>> The VM name is fine. I guess something like bh-demo-<name>.a.o might be
>> worth going for but I would also be happy to distinguish the demos with
>> something like bh-demo.a.o/<name>/
>>
>> In case it is helpful to know now, the two demos we expect to start with
>> would probably be:
>>
>>    * current - the latest official release
>>    * nightly - the current trunk, obviously rebuilt once a day
>>
>> I think there was also a suggestion of having any upcoming release demoed
>> over the voting period, although we may have to balance any benefit of
> that
>> against the possibility that votes will be made only on the basis of such
> a
>> demo.
>>
>> Cheers,
>>       Gary


Mime
View raw message