incubator-bloodhound-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "Gavin McDonald" <ga...@16degrees.com.au>
Subject RE: Demo VM ready (was: RE: Public demo instance hosted by third party)
Date Sat, 26 Jan 2013 07:20:57 GMT


> -----Original Message-----
> From: Jure Zitnik [mailto:jure@digiverse.si]
> Sent: Wednesday, 23 January 2013 4:05 AM
> To: bloodhound-dev@incubator.apache.org
> Subject: Re: Demo VM ready (was: RE: Public demo instance hosted by third
> party)
> 
> On 1/22/13 10:04 AM, Gavin McDonald wrote:
> > Hi All,
> >
> > As promised, a VM is ready to go.
> >
> > Currently gjm, mpoole and myself have access.
> >
> > Let me know if anyone else in interested in helping to maintain the
> > demo VM as a whole.
> 
> I'm interested in helping to maintain the demo VM so please add me to the
> list.

Please add a ssh pub key to id.apache.org and then try logging in to 
bloodhound-vm2.a.o

Thanks

Gav...

> 
> Cheers,
> Jure
> 
> 
> > I'd like to help with the setting up of the Demo Instances, so my work
> > is done here with my infra hat for now, but will continue on with my
> > bh hat on if I may.
> >
> > Thanks
> >
> > Gav...
> >
> >
> >> -----Original Message-----
> >> From: Gary Martin [mailto:gary.martin@wandisco.com]
> >> Sent: Friday, 11 January 2013 9:51 PM
> >> To: bloodhound-dev@incubator.apache.org
> >> Subject: Re: Public demo instance hosted by third party
> >>
> >> On 10/01/13 22:44, Gavin McDonald wrote:
> >>>> -----Original Message-----
> >>>> From: Joachim Dreimann [mailto:joachim.dreimann@wandisco.com]
> >>>> Sent: Friday, 11 January 2013 4:48 AM
> >>>> To: bloodhound-dev@incubator.apache.org
> >>>> Subject: Re: Public demo instance hosted by third party
> >>>>
> >>>> Indeed I think the ASF VM should be our first priority. I'm talking
> >>>> about
> >>> a
> >>>> temporary solution until then, not an advertising drive.
> >>>> I recognise that this could be a slippery slope (regarding user
> >>> perception), but
> >>>> I feel confident enough that the lack of slope (ie users) is more
> >>> important at
> >>>> this point. Hopefully Gary's change to the ticket and comment will
> >>>> achieve some progress.
> >>>>
> >>> I've got my eye on doing this rsn, just  the backlog of projects
> >>> jumping last minute with the svnpubsub/cms deadlines has kept us
> busy.
> >>>
> >>> I will start the VM today.
> >>>
> >>> what service urls do you want?
> >>>
> >>> I suggest a machine (VM) name of bloodhound-vm2.a.o with service
> >>> urls of something like bh-demo1.a.o , bh-demo2.a.o etc ?
> >> The VM name is fine. I guess something like bh-demo-<name>.a.o might
> >> be worth going for but I would also be happy to distinguish the demos
> >> with something like bh-demo.a.o/<name>/
> >>
> >> In case it is helpful to know now, the two demos we expect to start
> >> with would probably be:
> >>
> >>    * current - the latest official release
> >>    * nightly - the current trunk, obviously rebuilt once a day
> >>
> >> I think there was also a suggestion of having any upcoming release
> >> demoed over the voting period, although we may have to balance any
> >> benefit of
> > that
> >> against the possibility that votes will be made only on the basis of
> >> such
> > a
> >> demo.
> >>
> >> Cheers,
> >>       Gary



Mime
View raw message