Mailing-List: contact bloodhound-dev-help@incubator.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: bloodhound-dev@incubator.apache.org
Received-SPF: neutral (nike.apache.org: local policy)
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <50BC9DD6.5010807@wandisco.com>
References: 
 <CAJSKAsijOt3s4SX2kRM925CH1+G-oYafBqBMjRzpXvrZ0z6iHg@mail.gmail.com>
	<CAGMZAuN65PGNQii2zoaT95Rok0Seg3-+_EQohPWgPTNtk99wCg@mail.gmail.com>
	<CAHM0gng744s9RmDAWrMaJTmjN3Y+bjL7q1itPn_JjPMwXvaziQ@mail.gmail.com>
	<50BC9DD6.5010807@wandisco.com>
Date: Mon, 3 Dec 2012 14:05:59 +0100
Message-ID: 
 <CAJSKAshWDHjyb50WtLZV=jjSpcapC+tLT3QOuSBoQ=cuwrQbkQ@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: Browser, HTML and JS support
From: =?UTF-8?Q?Peter_Ko=C5=BEelj?= <peter@digiverse.si>
To: bloodhound-dev@incubator.apache.org
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=bcaec550b33620202d04cff26939

--bcaec550b33620202d04cff26939
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1

Agree

On 3 December 2012 13:40, Gary Martin <gary.martin@wandisco.com> wrote:

> On 03/12/12 09:43, Andrej Golcov wrote:
>
>> DESKTOP BROWSER ("official" support)
>>>> - Google Chrome on Windows and OSX
>>>> - Mozilla Firefox  on Windows and OSX
>>>>
>>> + Opera ;)
>>> ... and add GNU/Linux to OS list ... preferably Ubuntu .
>>>
>>>> - IE on Windows
>>>>
>>> I would strongly agree with Branko that, currently, Bloodhound effort
>> should concentrate on 80/20 approach in order to survive e.g. get user
>> base.
>>
>> If we take browser statistic ([1] and [2]), we get: Chrome, FF, IE on Win
>> and (optionally) OSX .
>> [1] http://www.w3schools.com/**browsers/browsers_stats.asp<http://www.w3schools.com/browsers/browsers_stats.asp>
>> [2] http://www.w3schools.com/**browsers/browsers_os.asp<http://www.w3schools.com/browsers/browsers_os.asp>
>>
>> Regards, Andrej
>>
>>
>>
> I can live with the limit on 'official' support to the original set stated
> by Peter. It seems to me that, in relation to issues associated with
> browsers outside the official set, this implies:
>
> 1. patches may be submitted to fix bugs associated with any OS/browser
>    combination but such patches must not compromise the officially
>    supported set.
> 2. tickets for bugs that are identified as only affecting browsers
>    outside the supported set are likely to be reduced in priority and
>    moved out of the release milestones.
>
>
> Is this good enough for everyone?
>
> In terms of rendering engines, we will effectively be supporting WebKit,
> Gecko and Trident so, unless there is any major discrepancies between
> implementations of the cross platform engines across their platforms, we
> should have good coverage overall.
>
> Cheers,
>     Gary
>
>

--bcaec550b33620202d04cff26939--