Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-incubator-bloodhound-dev-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-incubator-bloodhound-dev-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id A4101DF98 for ; Tue, 27 Nov 2012 16:00:49 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 22688 invoked by uid 500); 27 Nov 2012 16:00:49 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-incubator-bloodhound-dev-archive@incubator.apache.org Received: (qmail 22609 invoked by uid 500); 27 Nov 2012 16:00:48 -0000 Mailing-List: contact bloodhound-dev-help@incubator.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: bloodhound-dev@incubator.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list bloodhound-dev@incubator.apache.org Received: (qmail 22591 invoked by uid 99); 27 Nov 2012 16:00:48 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 27 Nov 2012 16:00:48 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.7 required=5.0 tests=RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of olemis@gmail.com designates 209.85.220.175 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.220.175] (HELO mail-vc0-f175.google.com) (209.85.220.175) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 27 Nov 2012 16:00:42 +0000 Received: by mail-vc0-f175.google.com with SMTP id m8so8552265vcd.6 for ; Tue, 27 Nov 2012 08:00:21 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type; bh=S/FIGNOhQuc1BZCn6VaAQlUUJAUa/bmo09k/fIic7gw=; b=eHxEANFcA/aTbVtDiz/5PH4ujZQM81wpcY9d5D6SZx4S4CZPATLUNnhKUnFpZj9aJg U4qP9UyMHGrPwdyMAA+BW+kdyVANnSqaQVwIaKIlKcfaaVN5AGHuep5T9OXyiP9Ce5w1 umBf+L3eEl6+EGwteNNw+6WUmr1r0Xmpl2N39TL76WsyQPt7tw6HKQ29EGX1C8ykmcd9 bwu8GkM1lOK15zvoH8sQfenVbCz2QapBG27Fz6KU92OMbgxXKu/YfDKMTOOskgfjoKED VAfB9kK+1fr9TA1pNKNxr7eGjWyRx0GMVAGBhRja4Zk7dzNJE4e4rHTmFcKwm9qmf74r gh8A== MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.52.177.166 with SMTP id cr6mr21961071vdc.1.1354032021804; Tue, 27 Nov 2012 08:00:21 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.58.156.71 with HTTP; Tue, 27 Nov 2012 08:00:21 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <50AFC584.7060601@wandisco.com> References: <058.57224df07188c14f36645fb9758197c6@incubator.apache.org> <073.22cbd29bca7f36a5c6331d575709d440@incubator.apache.org> <506D6C76.1090505@wandisco.com> <102201E8-01B8-4785-A126-F4463B3DBEF5@wandisco.com> <506DB268.5060908@wandisco.com> <506DD5FB.80704@wandisco.com> <506E55AF.7000907@wandisco.com> <5097D87E.40801@digiverse.si> <50AFC584.7060601@wandisco.com> Date: Tue, 27 Nov 2012 11:00:21 -0500 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [Apache Bloodhound] #146: Inline editing of objects From: Olemis Lang To: bloodhound-dev@incubator.apache.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org On 11/23/12, Gary Martin wrote: [...] > > Or something like that. So, apart from a clear idea of how we clearly > mark fields as edited, are there any other holes in this? It is also > worth considering if this fits with the current mechanisms for guarding > against conflicts dues to concurrent edits. Yes. I notice a gap here (unless I'm missing something ...) , and it is related to ticket workflow . Inline edits have to pass through workflow . Ideally we could always force `leave` action on in place edits but if Modify Ticket section won't be there then what shall we do ? -- Regards, Olemis. Blog ES: http://simelo-es.blogspot.com/ Blog EN: http://simelo-en.blogspot.com/ Featured article: