Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-incubator-bloodhound-dev-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-incubator-bloodhound-dev-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 97883DE2D for ; Thu, 8 Nov 2012 15:11:00 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 48035 invoked by uid 500); 8 Nov 2012 15:11:00 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-incubator-bloodhound-dev-archive@incubator.apache.org Received: (qmail 47838 invoked by uid 500); 8 Nov 2012 15:10:55 -0000 Mailing-List: contact bloodhound-dev-help@incubator.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: bloodhound-dev@incubator.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list bloodhound-dev@incubator.apache.org Delivered-To: moderator for bloodhound-dev@incubator.apache.org Received: (qmail 76504 invoked by uid 99); 8 Nov 2012 14:53:22 -0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.3 required=5.0 tests=RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: local policy) From: "Franklin, Matthew B." To: "general@incubator.apache.org" CC: "bloodhound-dev@incubator.apache.org" Subject: Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Bloodhound 0.2 (incubating) Thread-Topic: [VOTE] Release Apache Bloodhound 0.2 (incubating) Thread-Index: AQHNtelb3iLposK4GkW13M+lPNAI45fUOlsAgAdBswCABJmVgA== Date: Thu, 8 Nov 2012 14:52:54 +0000 Message-ID: <2E45169E9A237B4DA78078A68962F9EF06C56050@IMCMBX01.MITRE.ORG> In-Reply-To: Accept-Language: en-US Content-Language: en-US X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: user-agent: Microsoft-MacOutlook/14.2.4.120824 x-originating-ip: [172.31.40.100] Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-2" Content-ID: Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org On 11/5/12 6:38 AM, "Joachim Dreimann" wrote: >+1 (non-binding) > >Is there precedent on releasing with less than three +1s from IPMC members >if there are no 0s or -1s from anyone at all? >The minimum required 72 hours have also passed. Unfortunately, a release requires at least 3 IPMC members to vote +1. I am looking at it now and will cast a vote when I have properly reviewed the release. > >We'd really like to establish a frequent release cycle, Bloodhound 0.3 is >already ready to be packaged up as soon as 0.2 has been released. > >Thanks, >Joe > > >On 31 October 2012 21:49, Marvin Humphrey wrote: > >> On Mon, Oct 29, 2012 at 7:22 AM, Joachim Dreimann >> wrote: >> > The result of the vote is summarised here: >> > http://markmail.org/thread/zrgkleendiqvanzs >> >> This message didn't include an IPMC tally, but I see that Mentor Branko >> =C8ibej >> voted on the bloodhound-dev thread. That makes one IPMC member voting >>+1; >> two >> more are needed. >> >> > The vote will be open for at least 72 hours. >> >> Less than a day left... any takers? >> >> Marvin Humphrey >> > > > >--=20 >Joe Dreimann >UX Designer | WANdisco >* >* >*Transform your software development department. Register for a free SVN >HealthCheck *