incubator-bloodhound-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "Franklin, Matthew B." <mfrank...@mitre.org>
Subject Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Bloodhound 0.2 (incubating)
Date Thu, 08 Nov 2012 14:52:54 GMT
On 11/5/12 6:38 AM, "Joachim Dreimann" <joachim.dreimann@wandisco.com>
wrote:

>+1 (non-binding)
>
>Is there precedent on releasing with less than three +1s from IPMC members
>if there are no 0s or -1s from anyone at all?
>The minimum required 72 hours have also passed.

Unfortunately, a release requires at least 3 IPMC members to vote +1.

I am looking at it now and will cast a vote when I have properly reviewed
the release.

>
>We'd really like to establish a frequent release cycle, Bloodhound 0.3 is
>already ready to be packaged up as soon as 0.2 has been released.
>
>Thanks,
>Joe
>
>
>On 31 October 2012 21:49, Marvin Humphrey <marvin@rectangular.com> wrote:
>
>> On Mon, Oct 29, 2012 at 7:22 AM, Joachim Dreimann
>> <joachim.dreimann@wandisco.com> wrote:
>> > The result of the vote is summarised here:
>> >   http://markmail.org/thread/zrgkleendiqvanzs
>>
>> This message didn't include an IPMC tally, but I see that Mentor Branko
>> ─îibej
>> voted on the bloodhound-dev thread.  That makes one IPMC member voting
>>+1;
>> two
>> more are needed.
>>
>> > The vote will be open for at least 72 hours.
>>
>> Less than a day left... any takers?
>>
>> Marvin Humphrey
>>
>
>
>
>-- 
>Joe Dreimann
>UX Designer | WANdisco <http://www.wandisco.com/>
>*
>*
>*Transform your software development department. Register for a free SVN
>HealthCheck <http://go.wandisco.com/HealthCheck-Sig.html> *


Mime
View raw message