Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-incubator-bloodhound-dev-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-incubator-bloodhound-dev-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 5F7D2DBC9 for ; Fri, 5 Oct 2012 07:54:12 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 27089 invoked by uid 500); 5 Oct 2012 07:54:12 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-incubator-bloodhound-dev-archive@incubator.apache.org Received: (qmail 27051 invoked by uid 500); 5 Oct 2012 07:54:12 -0000 Mailing-List: contact bloodhound-dev-help@incubator.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: bloodhound-dev@incubator.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list bloodhound-dev@incubator.apache.org Received: (qmail 26968 invoked by uid 99); 5 Oct 2012 07:54:11 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 05 Oct 2012 07:54:11 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=2.2 required=5.0 tests=HTML_MESSAGE,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_NEUTRAL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: neutral (athena.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [209.85.223.175] (HELO mail-ie0-f175.google.com) (209.85.223.175) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 05 Oct 2012 07:54:05 +0000 Received: by mail-ie0-f175.google.com with SMTP id c13so3251872ieb.6 for ; Fri, 05 Oct 2012 00:53:44 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:sender:x-originating-ip:in-reply-to:references:date :x-google-sender-auth:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type :x-gm-message-state; bh=wTde3kJwXsnSYe+rHmkBmKlYsQItf6GvykhToGH9s18=; b=YAteJLzejgiz3fETsYTac0fCzXDlt0QDq3jCIWJyGAoT79W168zqiKjLOxYBnFF6RT Qa7F2sE15O1+OT+paysWrEraVw8s3PB+D24P26tSK7tAKvcjq3OmoF6WHnihQ6/XU9/9 vwNZPld/WIU1tDYTI1vJeHV94Pd8BFaBjuw44OjvEg8NnFyFcvaMMiP6jHCWwVMFtY23 JhMuIh0KJJM50qSFHtMlnRn7XD4Vk8ctlw4Te767wSM7Ni9GAscNTinvOEu+h5jseV67 7TQw0XGF9bHfddic5/J00vHrBD/w+vLyp4MPbrwNEIdzl9kPUTo2/QrDfexXZglF9vzE xnuw== MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.50.189.200 with SMTP id gk8mr403110igc.65.1349423624249; Fri, 05 Oct 2012 00:53:44 -0700 (PDT) Sender: peter@xlii.si Received: by 10.64.41.99 with HTTP; Fri, 5 Oct 2012 00:53:44 -0700 (PDT) X-Originating-IP: [188.196.23.143] In-Reply-To: <506DA300.4010002@wandisco.com> References: <506DA300.4010002@wandisco.com> Date: Fri, 5 Oct 2012 09:53:44 +0200 X-Google-Sender-Auth: scXHQs6nABag6yAAoUxXsviobh0 Message-ID: Subject: Re: dashboard ticket query ordering From: =?UTF-8?Q?Peter_Ko=C5=BEelj?= To: bloodhound-dev@incubator.apache.org Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=14dae9340859c65f6a04cb4b2bcb X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQmY6C63IaFVs7Z7g+D7p2O+b3UZmPM/6s/ywCPax6ok/mnRnwrltDxdQLvGr6tkwOrtPsuO X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org --14dae9340859c65f6a04cb4b2bcb Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 If we are only talking about ordering, why not just enhance the widgets so that if the user clicks on a column title, that is the field that the results are sorted by? What is in dashboard definition would only be the default then. In to long run we need user configurable dashboard as well as user configurable widgets. Peter On Thu, Oct 4, 2012 at 4:53 PM, Gary Martin wrote: > Hi, > > As I understand it, we want the dashboard view to show a list of tickets > that is likely to be interesting to the viewer. In order to focus in we > will probably need additional plugins for watched tickets, ticket due dates > and so on. However, given that these plugins could be turned off or > ignored, we should probably already be looking at making sure that we have > a reasonable order for the tickets. > > At the moment the queries are in ticket created order and the main way > that this is mitigated is that we have one list of "My Tickets" and one for > "Active Tickets". I was wondering whether we could order the tickets by > milestone due date while we don't have ticket due dates but this appears to > require a custom report. Secondary ordering should probably be by ticket > priority for the moment. > > Does this sound reasonable for now? > > Cheers, > Gary > --14dae9340859c65f6a04cb4b2bcb--