Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-incubator-bloodhound-dev-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-incubator-bloodhound-dev-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 29D45D829 for ; Fri, 12 Oct 2012 14:29:21 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 45099 invoked by uid 500); 12 Oct 2012 14:29:21 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-incubator-bloodhound-dev-archive@incubator.apache.org Received: (qmail 45060 invoked by uid 500); 12 Oct 2012 14:29:20 -0000 Mailing-List: contact bloodhound-dev-help@incubator.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: bloodhound-dev@incubator.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list bloodhound-dev@incubator.apache.org Received: (qmail 45048 invoked by uid 99); 12 Oct 2012 14:29:20 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 12 Oct 2012 14:29:20 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.7 required=5.0 tests=RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of gary.martin@wandisco.com designates 209.85.214.47 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.214.47] (HELO mail-bk0-f47.google.com) (209.85.214.47) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 12 Oct 2012 14:29:12 +0000 Received: by mail-bk0-f47.google.com with SMTP id jk7so1540858bkc.6 for ; Fri, 12 Oct 2012 07:28:50 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=20120113; h=message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to:subject:references :in-reply-to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding :x-gm-message-state; bh=Eh16AfSh+w8b4mPPw1cYUECzSp2z4/iMLChVYwBwt4I=; b=Yf7LXysKRk4L+yj1zs1q8UWOnR1EWOtBm/k6GEAiwU5VgQtwqJV3rrRY5z2ZKwUpnl zL+0cWQB3wBPzatCGBa0fI+SYKCBXOjouFHvrqVrYyHCSwG0ku5ExzvB7ToVbT0OI8rl kMfDmKsAIBHFU33cMisWce+CXh6huVpCfrXuxP+TAsiECjUprg+E1kgpmF2Rvenb/eoK FNHEJY+cGkh3MQPpxgsH1n3CFSOPkFv8UY1CPUCbSXmzm01Z1gA+UeaEvobXDgnPPJCr oaIaNNmUsq90Ssx93wotB+wUKaSZSr00TlFzcSA+FLdkBd/8NSnp9fEcI9LQ+FowuNmY 9L3g== Received: by 10.204.128.201 with SMTP id l9mr1382776bks.66.1350052130189; Fri, 12 Oct 2012 07:28:50 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [10.2.5.205] ([77.86.30.139]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id m19sm5924430bkm.8.2012.10.12.07.28.48 (version=SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Fri, 12 Oct 2012 07:28:49 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <5078291E.6020609@wandisco.com> Date: Fri, 12 Oct 2012 15:28:46 +0100 From: Gary Martin User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:16.0) Gecko/20121011 Thunderbird/16.0.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: bloodhound-dev@incubator.apache.org Subject: Re: [Apache Bloodhound] #206: Ticket fields layout broken if custom textarea fields are declared References: <055.3aad184346ff404cdf6a648e382463f9@incubator.apache.org> <070.a994d4354b503039ac5d30b9c518191a@incubator.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <070.a994d4354b503039ac5d30b9c518191a@incubator.apache.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQm7AhT9ipMqCFlJjpHjlkhAVVHggQ0ZEfup20Xi8BqegQrs8l7rm6XopYIEOrVfNCuRd3N1 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org On 09/10/12 11:49, Apache Bloodhound wrote: > #206: Ticket fields layout broken if custom textarea fields are declared > ------------------------+----------------------------------- > Reporter: olemis | Owner: olemis > Type: defect | Status: accepted > Priority: blocker | Milestone: Release 2 > Component: ui design | Version: > Resolution: | Keywords: ticket field textarea > ------------------------+----------------------------------- > > Comment (by jdreimann): > > Replying to [comment:11 olemis]: > > Replying to [comment:10 jdreimann]: > > [...] It seems to me that description field is more relevant than any > possible text or textarea custom ticket field a ticket might ever have . > Those are not in there «to give a quick overview of the state of the > ticket» but to document some aspects related to the ticket (e.g. ''Release > notes'' and ''API changes'' defined in t.e.o issue tracker). Hence it's a > reasonable decision to place description `div.well` above those fields . > > I see your point. I wouldn't mind if you set that as the default, we can > change it based on actual user feedback later if desired. > > > After applying `pull-right` class to field label it looks like this . > [...] > > I think that's enough of an improvement to go with it for now. Ultimately > I believe we'd want the `Keys` to be left-aligned to make them more easily > scannable, but currently the potentially huge gap this leaves between > `Keys` and `Values` reduces overall readability in my view. > It looks like the conversation continued on the ticket for a bit. The upshot appears to be that the suggested patches will put the description closer to the top of the ticket, separating out the custom fields. In addition I think we will end up with a two column layout. I will need to test those assertions as I am not sure that is precisely what the associated screenshot in the ticket suggests: https://issues.apache.org/bloodhound/attachment/ticket/174/bh_theme_x_77_ticket_scrollspy_v3.png (note that the scrollspy button bar above the fields is a result of a different ticket which I hope to review shortly). I will attempt to assess the patches themselves but all thoughts are welcome. Cheers, Gary