incubator-bloodhound-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Ryan Ollos <ryan.ol...@wandisco.com>
Subject Fwd: FW: [The Trac Project] #10923: Initial syntax highlighting sample fails in pygments preferences for browsers other than firefox
Date Fri, 26 Oct 2012 08:19:45 GMT
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: The Trac Project [mailto:noreply@edgewall.com]
> Sent: Thursday, October 25, 2012 04:47
> Cc: trac-tickets@lynx.edgewall.com
> Subject: Re: [The Trac Project] #10923: Initial syntax highlighting sample
> fails in pygments preferences for browsers other than firefox
> #10923: Initial syntax highlighting sample fails in pygments preferences
> for browsers other than firefox
> -------------------------------------------+------------------
>  Reporter:  Ryan J Ollos <ryan.j.ollos@…>  |       Owner:
>      Type:  defect                         |      Status:  new
>  Priority:  normal                         |   Milestone:
> Component:  rendering                      |     Version:
>  Severity:  normal                         |  Resolution:
>  Keywords:                                 |
> -------------------------------------------+------------------
> Release Notes:
>
>
> API Changes:
>
> -------------------------------------------+------------------
> Comment (by cboos):
>  [OT] As the "b" shortcuts are quite popular (#B1, #bn1, #bl1), it was not
>  obvious which one to choose for BloodHound: bh or bd? Pick one or both ;-)



I was planning to reply that `bh` is good itertrac prefix for bloodhound
(in addition to the already existing `bloodhound`). Just wanted to get some
other opinions.

Mime
  • Unnamed multipart/alternative (inline, None, 0 bytes)
View raw message