incubator-bloodhound-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Peter Koželj <pe...@digiverse.si>
Subject Re: [Apache Bloodhound] #146: Inline editing of objects
Date Thu, 04 Oct 2012 16:00:16 GMT
Typo: I actually meant: "... by saving tickets without explicit save
action ..."

On Thu, Oct 4, 2012 at 5:58 PM, Peter Koželj <peter@digiverse.si> wrote:

> Even if I ignore possible user confusion by saving tickets with explicit
> save action,
> wouldn't this actually trigger multiple ticket change notification and
> create multiple ticket history entries?
>
> Peter
>
> On Thu, Oct 4, 2012 at 5:54 PM, Joachim Dreimann <
> joachim.dreimann@wandisco.com> wrote:
>
>> On 4 Oct 2012, at 12:01, Gary Martin <gary.martin@wandisco.com> wrote:
>> >> On 03/10/12 20:50, Olemis Lang wrote:
>> >>   - Decide how to notify in-place modifications (verbose vs quiet ,
>> >> configurable ? , ...)
>> >
>> > Does this mean that each change individually updates the ticket on the
>> server? I thought that we would be going with users submitting all changes
>> once they are happy with the new state of the ticket.
>> >
>>
>> I would expect every radio button / drop down change to save immediately,
>> users should only need to confirm textfields or similar where incomplete
>> information would be very likely if we save after every letter or when the
>> box loses focus.
>>
>> Joe
>>
>>
>

Mime
  • Unnamed multipart/alternative (inline, None, 0 bytes)
View raw message