incubator-bloodhound-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Gary Martin <gary.mar...@wandisco.com>
Subject Re: Fwd: FW: [The Trac Project] #10923: Initial syntax highlighting sample fails in pygments preferences for browsers other than firefox
Date Fri, 26 Oct 2012 08:43:11 GMT
On 26/10/12 09:19, Ryan Ollos wrote:
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: The Trac Project [mailto:noreply@edgewall.com]
>> Sent: Thursday, October 25, 2012 04:47
>> Cc: trac-tickets@lynx.edgewall.com
>> Subject: Re: [The Trac Project] #10923: Initial syntax highlighting sample
>> fails in pygments preferences for browsers other than firefox
>> #10923: Initial syntax highlighting sample fails in pygments preferences
>> for browsers other than firefox
>> -------------------------------------------+------------------
>>   Reporter:  Ryan J Ollos <ryan.j.ollos@…>  |       Owner:
>>       Type:  defect                         |      Status:  new
>>   Priority:  normal                         |   Milestone:
>> Component:  rendering                      |     Version:
>>   Severity:  normal                         |  Resolution:
>>   Keywords:                                 |
>> -------------------------------------------+------------------
>> Release Notes:
>>
>>
>> API Changes:
>>
>> -------------------------------------------+------------------
>> Comment (by cboos):
>>   [OT] As the "b" shortcuts are quite popular (#B1, #bn1, #bl1), it was not
>>   obvious which one to choose for BloodHound: bh or bd? Pick one or both ;-)
>
>
> I was planning to reply that `bh` is good itertrac prefix for bloodhound
> (in addition to the already existing `bloodhound`). Just wanted to get some
> other opinions.
>

Given that many of us unofficially use and understand bh as bloodhound, 
that would seem most useful. Why not?

Cheers,
     Gary

Mime
View raw message