From bloodhound-dev-return-739-apmail-incubator-bloodhound-dev-archive=incubator.apache.org@incubator.apache.org Wed Sep 19 17:58:45 2012 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-incubator-bloodhound-dev-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-incubator-bloodhound-dev-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 87985D226 for ; Wed, 19 Sep 2012 17:58:45 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 20851 invoked by uid 500); 19 Sep 2012 17:58:45 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-incubator-bloodhound-dev-archive@incubator.apache.org Received: (qmail 20835 invoked by uid 500); 19 Sep 2012 17:58:45 -0000 Mailing-List: contact bloodhound-dev-help@incubator.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: bloodhound-dev@incubator.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list bloodhound-dev@incubator.apache.org Received: (qmail 20827 invoked by uid 99); 19 Sep 2012 17:58:45 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 19 Sep 2012 17:58:45 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.7 required=5.0 tests=RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of olemis@gmail.com designates 209.85.212.47 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.212.47] (HELO mail-vb0-f47.google.com) (209.85.212.47) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 19 Sep 2012 17:58:39 +0000 Received: by vbbez10 with SMTP id ez10so1531394vbb.6 for ; Wed, 19 Sep 2012 10:58:18 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=XYLj1McXhLxOLEczaS43MhS29+NMp+E2bTeOdDz19ys=; b=nLqGWzgoPyvS//QeVR916VbYcgxHISwY1kTZkO0NU9jnZAZa9dDZxI72sVVnDe6cDg 5foAwkM7WxP4ddGtz8ifwT24+9ZIkOvS2juV7tEooxSA1oBVzYKxRPoGKaDKNYniqnQy TrL7KllQ9LWmuF5IzteoebrUeITQKl+JBTw5cQZj1PL4lxv17bblT3D+forwV7aiYPNO wyo4H/i6bDCBHJkpzR9imnswrshZvFhqr5JT4jUA7Rng8GTO9xbTDnyJiWL6JCvaMDUb OxxfZevGoYqQE8nokJ4mtB3IfBPzpnJJaGxH1oHej5ytJpBNCzu9xQXJnu7pH2LgdegK zpUg== MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.52.22.40 with SMTP id a8mr1947570vdf.4.1348077498896; Wed, 19 Sep 2012 10:58:18 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.58.79.177 with HTTP; Wed, 19 Sep 2012 10:58:18 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <5423CED3-7E10-48CB-B445-937F444457D4@wandisco.com> References: <058.556d561ac8118c74aff2b0380f421667@incubator.apache.org> <073.4e66acd1d3eab58cf63112d9a398a95c@incubator.apache.org> <50599857.30602@wandisco.com> <5059AB01.60704@wandisco.com> <5423CED3-7E10-48CB-B445-937F444457D4@wandisco.com> Date: Wed, 19 Sep 2012 12:58:18 -0500 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [Apache Bloodhound] #187: Remove row count and results pagination from Dashboard From: Olemis Lang To: bloodhound-dev@incubator.apache.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On 9/19/12, Joachim Dreimann wrote: > I agree with displaying the total number - the More link could show "32 > More" for example to indicate how many more tickets there will be. > Alternatively we could show something like: > > More 42 Total > This was implemented before and removed . Before a label like =ABResults 34 - 46 of 256=BB was displayed , because , if you notice (in general) grid template and widgets may display a page different from the first page and number of rows may be specified as a param as well . If u ask me I'd rather prefer that label we removed once upon a time ... There should be some old screenshot in the issue tracker or in my Google+ albums (<=3D more probable in the later ;) illustrating this . Somewhere after a request posted somewhere ... it was removed . > I believe we should always show the more link though, not just > conditionally. It stands not just for 'more tickets', but also represents > 'more query options', 'more filtering' etc - functionality that we may no= t > want to duplicate on the Dashboard, and at least won't in the short term. > oh ! we agree then , as I mentioned in previous message --=20 Regards, Olemis. Blog ES: http://simelo-es.blogspot.com/ Blog EN: http://simelo-en.blogspot.com/ Featured article: