incubator-bloodhound-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Olemis Lang <ole...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: [PROPOSAL] Initial Release
Date Tue, 17 Jul 2012 05:04:03 GMT
On 7/16/12, Greg Stein <gstein@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Sun, Jul 15, 2012 at 9:58 PM, Gary Martin <gary.martin@wandisco.com>
> wrote:
>
[...]
>
>> Anyway, in the meantime, I thought I should propose that we vote on a
>> release. I expect the release to go out with the name
>> apache-bloodhound-incubating-0.1, based on the new 0.1 branch.
>
> Please note that we vote on the actual artifacts rather than what is
> sitting in a branch.
>
> I also noted a commit directly to the branch. For
> release/tracking/mgmt purposes, I might suggest only ever committing
> to trunk, and branches only get merges from trunk. Thus, we can always
> ensure that trunk has all changes. It also helps to keep trunk moving
> and cherry pick stuff to the release branch.
>
> This project is still young, and may not need strong release mgmt
> right now, but I would suggest reading:
>   http://subversion.apache.org/docs/community-guide/releasing.html
>

interesting ! ... so ... maybe 0.1rc1 should be used instead if strong
release management is considered . Did I get this right ?

> Skimming is fine, but that page may help people to consider what may
> be important for this community. For example, we likely would not
> create 0.1.1, but just move onwards to 0.2. Once the project gets
> further down its roadmap, then introducing some stronger release
> management (and maybe following svn's model) could become more
> important.
>

IMO ... +1

-- 
Regards,

Olemis.

Blog ES: http://simelo-es.blogspot.com/
Blog EN: http://simelo-en.blogspot.com/

Featured article:

Mime
View raw message