incubator-bloodhound-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Olemis Lang <ole...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: The case for introducing jEditable WAS: svn commit: r1300553 - in /incubator/bloodhound/trunk/doc/wireframes: quick_create.png src/quick_create.bmml
Date Wed, 14 Mar 2012 21:09:02 GMT
On Wed, Mar 14, 2012 at 1:31 PM, Gary <gary.martin@wandisco.com> wrote:
> On 03/14/2012 05:53 PM, Olemis Lang wrote:
>> On Wed, Mar 14, 2012 at 12:36 PM, Olemis Lang<olemis@gmail.com>  wrote:
>>> On Wed, Mar 14, 2012 at 12:26 PM, Joe Dreimann
>>> <joachim.dreimann@wandisco.com>  wrote:
>>>> On 14 Mar 2012, at 17:11, Olemis Lang<olemis@gmail.com>  wrote:
>>>>> On Wed, Mar 14, 2012 at 12:06 PM, Joachim Dreimann
>>>>> <joachim.dreimann@wandisco.com>  wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> We should be able to do all these options out of the box with very
>>>>>> little manual javascript/html/css.
>>>
>>> [...]
>>
>>> .. [1] Jeditable – Edit In Place Plugin For jQuery
>>>        (http://www.appelsiini.net/projects/jeditable)
>>>
>> What do you all think about that ?
>> Looking forward to your replies
>
> Well, in-place editing is likely to be useful elsewhere - here I am thinking
> of editing an existing ticket's fields in particular. I am not sure how
> difficult it will be to provide custom code for these but if there is an
> existing jquery plugin that already works, that is interesting.
>

IMO
+1 for including jEditable (from a technical perspective)
nonetheless , license and other relevant subjects still need to be
reviewed and discussed ... I guess .

-- 
Regards,

Olemis.

Mime
View raw message