incubator-bloodhound-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Gary <gary.mar...@wandisco.com>
Subject Re: Bloodhound thoughts
Date Tue, 21 Feb 2012 12:56:23 GMT
On 02/21/2012 12:42 PM, Itamar O wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 21, 2012 at 2:32 PM, Gary<gary.martin@wandisco.com>  wrote:
>
>> On 02/20/2012 08:14 PM, Ian Wild wrote:
>>
>>> I'm planning to reach out to a couple of the GPL Plugin developers this
>>> week to see how they would feel about allowing Bloodhound to use these
>>> plugins under a different license. Hopefully we'll be able to find a way
>>> forward on that, but if not I would think it's inevitable that we'll need
>>> to build-in equivalent functionality.
>>>
>>> Ian
>>>
>>>
>> I think we might need to add http://trac-hacks.org/wiki/**CkEditorPlugin<http://trac-hacks.org/wiki/CkEditorPlugin>to
the list of plugins to investigate license on if it is preferable to
>> TracWysiwygPlugin. In this case, it is the underlying CkEditor that might
>> be the problem. It is multi-licensed as GPL/LGPL/MPL.
>>
> As I just mentioned in another thread, the CkEditorPlugin should not be a
> problem, as I don't mind relicensing it as needed, as long as it plays well
> with CKEditor's license.
> Assuming licensing problems are solved, the real problems are maintenance
> of the plugin... (no much work occurs these days)
>

I was about to reply to that...

I think that we should be interested in collaborating if the licensing 
situation of CKEditor can be resolved. Thanks for the offer.

Cheers,
     Gary


Mime
View raw message