Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-incubator-bloodhound-dev-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-incubator-bloodhound-dev-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id D07C0BC30 for ; Tue, 10 Jan 2012 14:31:57 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 58522 invoked by uid 500); 10 Jan 2012 13:58:50 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-incubator-bloodhound-dev-archive@incubator.apache.org Received: (qmail 58483 invoked by uid 500); 10 Jan 2012 13:58:46 -0000 Mailing-List: contact bloodhound-dev-help@incubator.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: bloodhound-dev@incubator.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list bloodhound-dev@incubator.apache.org Received: (qmail 58450 invoked by uid 99); 10 Jan 2012 13:58:43 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 10 Jan 2012 13:58:43 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.0 required=5.0 tests=SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of silk@boktor.net designates 89.248.165.14 as permitted sender) Received: from [89.248.165.14] (HELO cox.rootnode.net) (89.248.165.14) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 10 Jan 2012 13:58:34 +0000 Received: from stallman2.rootnode.net (stallman2.rootnode.net [89.248.171.138]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by cox.rootnode.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id B1E38801BE2B for ; Tue, 10 Jan 2012 14:58:12 +0100 (CET) Date: Tue, 10 Jan 2012 14:58:13 +0100 From: Grzegorz Sobanski To: bloodhound-dev@incubator.apache.org Subject: Re: [Trac-dev] Bloodhound / Trac Approach Message-ID: <20120110135813.GA15587@stallman2.rootnode.net> Mail-Followup-To: bloodhound-dev@incubator.apache.org References: <4F07380E.7060505@wandisco.com> <4F08E39E.3060001@wandisco.com> <4F0C3990.4020906@wandisco.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <4F0C3990.4020906@wandisco.com> Organization: Boktor User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) X-Greylist: Sender succeeded SMTP AUTH, not delayed by milter-greylist-4.3.8 (cox.rootnode.net [0.0.0.0]); Tue, 10 Jan 2012 14:58:12 +0100 (CET) X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org * Gary [2012-01-10 14:52]: > Does anyone have any reason to consider 0.13 particularly unstable? > I assume that there is a relative lack of 0.13 user base to judge > stability with of course. AFAIK 0.12 and 0.13 do not differ much. I am running 0.13dev in production for some time, and do not have any problems. greets -- silk