Mailing-List: contact bigtop-dev-help@incubator.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: bigtop-dev@incubator.apache.org
Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of shaposhnik@gmail.com designates
 209.85.212.47 as permitted sender)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Sender: shaposhnik@gmail.com
In-Reply-To: <20120828180727.GE32535@linspire.com>
References: <20120824182336.GW1008@linspire.com>
	<C7C5F1B9-3006-4A02-BFA8-C709EE344B27@hortonworks.com>
	<20120825042131.GJ28843@tpx>
	<38BDBA2C-7C7F-4C17-9800-29155B8B727D@hortonworks.com>
	<20120828180727.GE32535@linspire.com>
Date: Tue, 28 Aug 2012 18:01:36 -0700
Message-ID: 
 <CA+ULb+utrZEd2NwpuEsWZst2eVDKrAoAG+45DLPJCe94cS6sog@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: [DISCUSS] Bigtop 0.3.1: target release date, supported platforms,
 bill of materials
From: Roman Shaposhnik <rvs@apache.org>
To: bigtop-dev@incubator.apache.org
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=14dae9cfc770bee1b104c85d1978

--14dae9cfc770bee1b104c85d1978
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1

Changing this into a [DISCUSS] thread to not confuse the vote.

On Tue, Aug 28, 2012 at 11:07 AM, Konstantin Boudnik <cos@apache.org> wrote:
> That'd be awesome, Alan.
>
> We have a couple of sound BOM update proposals, so I will restart the vote
> once I hear from you on these 2 components.

I'm also curious about the list of supported platforms (and I admit this is
an open ended policy question, rather than anything else): what do
we, as a community, want the overlap between Bigtop 0.3.0 and
Bigtop 0.3.1 supported platforms be? Or is that even an issue?


Thanks,
Roman.

--14dae9cfc770bee1b104c85d1978--