Mailing-List: contact bigtop-dev-help@incubator.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: bigtop-dev@incubator.apache.org
Received-SPF: neutral (athena.apache.org: local policy)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v1084)
Subject: Re: [VOTE] BOM for Bigtop 0.4.0
From: Alan Gates <gates@hortonworks.com>
In-Reply-To: <20120521193738.GR16609@linspire.com>
Date: Mon, 21 May 2012 21:49:36 -0700
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <DC36EFF9-CDB7-4E1C-B888-C86BB0CB9321@hortonworks.com>
References: 
 <CA+ULb+uAowXOvfa-8RuXTHXDZRhCc7Ad-N1qRCQqDGpp_v5Njw@mail.gmail.com>
 <CA+ULb+uFDx6z05w0itiXmwhQTtNepXEP2QmO4EUA6MwUeGJrow@mail.gmail.com>
 <20120521193738.GR16609@linspire.com>
To: bigtop-dev@incubator.apache.org

I don't know what the rules are for a BOM vote.  It seems close to a =
release vote, which would indicate a -1 is not a veto (ie it's a =
majority vote). =20

However, continuing down this path we'll end up with a -1 from Owen when =
it comes time to release 0.4.  Releases are majority votes, but the rest =
of the IPMC is going to take a long hard look if you have a -1 from one =
of your mentors.  I think it's in everyone's interest to work this out =
now rather than ignore his -1 only to bump into it again when it's time =
to release.  I realize you feel his -1 is unjustified.  But simply =
declaring it to be so and moving on will not make the issue go away.

Alan.

On May 21, 2012, at 12:37 PM, Konstantin Boudnik wrote:

> What's the official vote count? Can we move forward?=20
>=20
> Considering that the only -1 here has never been granted a reasonable =
factual
> explanation, it doesn't seem like a valid -1 after all.
>=20
> Let's move forward
>  Cos
>=20
> On Fri, May 18, 2012 at 04:19PM, Roman Shaposhnik wrote:
>> On Wed, May 16, 2012 at 8:09 AM, Roman Shaposhnik <rvs@apache.org> =
wrote:
>>> I would like to put the following BOM and list of supported
>>> platforms for a vote. The vote will run till noon PST on Fri
>>> 5/18. Please vote by that time.
>>=20
>> The vote is now officially closed. Thanks to everybody who voted.
>>=20
>> Before I publish the final tally, though, I'd like to clarify Owen's =
vote
>> by asking the following questions.
>>=20
>> Owen, could you, please be so kind as to answer just yes or no:
>>=20
>> 1. Are you voting against Bigtop including source code that will
>> make it possible to build/deploy/validate Hue?
>>=20
>> 2. Are you voting against Bigtop publishing convenience artifacts
>> that will include Hue?
>>=20
>> 3. Do you realize that #1 and #2 are fundamentally different issues?
>>=20
>> Thanks,
>> Roman.