incubator-bigtop-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "Edward J. Yoon" <edwardy...@apache.org>
Subject Re: [VOTE] BOM for Bigtop 0.4.0
Date Thu, 17 May 2012 22:40:02 GMT
BIGTOP-515 can be added to the roadmap?

On Fri, May 18, 2012 at 7:35 AM, Konstantin Boudnik <cos@apache.org> wrote:
> On Thu, May 17, 2012 at 03:19PM, Owen O'Malley wrote:
>> On Wed, May 16, 2012 at 8:09 AM, Roman Shaposhnik <rvs@apache.org> wrote:
>> > I would like to put the following BOM and list of supported
>> > platforms for a vote. The vote will run till noon PST on Fri
>> > 5/18. Please vote by that time. If you feel strongly about
>> > anything on this list, feel free to show up at our Meetup
>> > on Thu 5/17 and have your case argued in front of the live
>> > audience  ;-)
>> >
>> > BOM:
>> >  * Hadoop 2.0.0-alpha
>> >  * Zookeeper 3.4.3
>> >  * HBase 0.92.1
>> >  * Pig 0.10.0
>> >  * Hive 0.9.0
>> >  * Oozie 3.2
>> >  * Sqoop 1.4.1
>> >  * Whirr 0.7.1
>> >  * Mahout 0.6.1
>> >  * Flume 1.1.0
>> >  * Hue 2.0.0
>> >  * Giraph 0.2
>>
>> Since Roman says, I wasn't clear enough, I'm -1 to a Bigtop release
>> that includes distributes non-Apache projects as binary packages.
>
> Could you please refer us to the exact spot in the ASF policies where this is
> prohibited? And why Hadoop releases are allowed to happen while they are
> including binary packages/libraries of non-Apache projects?
>
> If there's no policy regulating this matter then your -1 is clearly
> not-substantial. And as such should be disregarded.
>
> May be there are other reasons you would be willing to bring up?
>
> Cos
>



-- 
Best Regards, Edward J. Yoon
@eddieyoon

Mime
View raw message