Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-incubator-bigtop-dev-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-incubator-bigtop-dev-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 51DF999DC for ; Thu, 12 Apr 2012 23:07:45 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 78574 invoked by uid 500); 12 Apr 2012 23:07:45 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-incubator-bigtop-dev-archive@incubator.apache.org Received: (qmail 78538 invoked by uid 500); 12 Apr 2012 23:07:45 -0000 Mailing-List: contact bigtop-dev-help@incubator.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: bigtop-dev@incubator.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list bigtop-dev@incubator.apache.org Received: (qmail 78530 invoked by uid 99); 12 Apr 2012 23:07:45 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 12 Apr 2012 23:07:45 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=2.2 required=5.0 tests=HTML_MESSAGE,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_NEUTRAL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: neutral (nike.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [209.85.215.47] (HELO mail-lpp01m010-f47.google.com) (209.85.215.47) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 12 Apr 2012 23:07:37 +0000 Received: by lagw12 with SMTP id w12so1906335lag.6 for ; Thu, 12 Apr 2012 16:07:17 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :content-type:x-gm-message-state; bh=MlaCgZ/tqWEORG+VcJGsh4QvHLAXMTf6pbsOfBVi+tQ=; b=GY0FaPtngEnrQKLkoSr2w1R9zF83N8LdqOkTNwoRIbFfVveXKCV9Ybm/sOQyWt3MKN u6z9yYQITr60JoeRrLjR9dP3+wMxysKaP60DEn+ICAE8ov2qFCr6vjgipPL3iie9fbaT 0eNT8jtipuIde/sb0bdCUBxxM5iX1z9Zl9/IxTN01IEBK0d2XdileWmVfyPcufPh5G26 pB9zfSLru0vSqLhOV13KMfKx9nr85jNlWaNVoprlmxxAGEsGFv3/wBsWykD9peN51flF uLETa2CTIclNBek1igMnMJYlcY/m06PRrN6e9eUC75zpa8vpqwtBEQQLl3mzHt2wTy4l tSqg== Received: by 10.112.98.162 with SMTP id ej2mr1995232lbb.98.1334272037076; Thu, 12 Apr 2012 16:07:17 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.112.37.131 with HTTP; Thu, 12 Apr 2012 16:06:46 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: From: Matt Foley Date: Thu, 12 Apr 2012 16:06:46 -0700 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [VOTE] Merging hadoop-0.23 branch into trunk To: bigtop-dev@incubator.apache.org Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=f46d0401f8e9cdbefc04bd836aab X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQmW+LZ1bWtOT6TFeIEFn3Nfs1g8KXcTTOU1CD03t0hYYwIl+gURxOcSUEisz7oAlqqy65ff --f46d0401f8e9cdbefc04bd836aab Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Hi Roman, I don't understand this statement: >> The work on the Hadoop 1.X line will be constrained to >> the branch-3. Did you mean (BigTop) "branch-0.3"? Thanks, --Matt On Thu, Apr 12, 2012 at 10:29 AM, Roman Shaposhnik wrote: > Hi! > > It seems that there's a silent consensus about the > fact that Bigtop 0.4.0 should be based on Hadoop 2.X > > To that end, I propose that we merge the content of > the hadoop-0.23 branch into the trunk and start calling > the result: 0.4.0-incubating-SNAPSHOT > > The work on the Hadoop 1.X line will be constrained to > the branch-3. > > Please vote by 4/14 noon PST > > Thanks, > Roman. > --f46d0401f8e9cdbefc04bd836aab--