Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-incubator-bigtop-dev-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-incubator-bigtop-dev-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 3C6D9950E for ; Mon, 19 Mar 2012 00:23:04 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 45756 invoked by uid 500); 19 Mar 2012 00:23:04 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-incubator-bigtop-dev-archive@incubator.apache.org Received: (qmail 45643 invoked by uid 500); 19 Mar 2012 00:23:03 -0000 Mailing-List: contact bigtop-dev-help@incubator.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: bigtop-dev@incubator.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list bigtop-dev@incubator.apache.org Received: (qmail 45628 invoked by uid 99); 19 Mar 2012 00:23:03 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 19 Mar 2012 00:23:03 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.7 required=5.0 tests=RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of shaposhnik@gmail.com designates 209.85.214.47 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.214.47] (HELO mail-bk0-f47.google.com) (209.85.214.47) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 19 Mar 2012 00:22:58 +0000 Received: by bkcjg15 with SMTP id jg15so4253598bkc.6 for ; Sun, 18 Mar 2012 17:22:36 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:date :x-google-sender-auth:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; bh=SnmpsgDU6AnCG8Dl21MRRen6hQIntCZn5nLrL69lYz0=; b=Xh7YnUo5WZACWNuYU6UiLcQiACHQBUOPiQBPOMNdMtvF/gRC8rP53hV7ciYqu8LjCk 5wV4+rOJWELgInpqh7750aJgcS73X5zOe/ovue7CYAnnLc4ujIYaxOkLyAo+jKxNg4Lr hrV2lxCYLlFCoom/Z3MIP+tb9TlHB5CuMKP07a650dMS9KqH+qRpRO7qi2QnFR4uILhf xJHIn/TzFdqQOTeTCDHQcmpOsTa8H4kkmsmE8QEeVKucvVtbQeGJumnw+TKVKvnrWzA4 dqTlvUefxWRpb9b4GHhz8GtJDa0E4qP8Y4v3/SQwPqmu3+QgFX31xM0/CbSbogLcDfFA lmRw== MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.204.155.143 with SMTP id s15mr3814307bkw.44.1332116556770; Sun, 18 Mar 2012 17:22:36 -0700 (PDT) Sender: shaposhnik@gmail.com Received: by 10.204.62.82 with HTTP; Sun, 18 Mar 2012 17:22:36 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: Date: Sun, 18 Mar 2012 17:22:36 -0700 X-Google-Sender-Auth: ffzsE0lIBC9MFeALGQSudCBC_xA Message-ID: Subject: Re: RedHat moving to OpenJDK From: Roman Shaposhnik To: bigtop-dev@incubator.apache.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org On Thu, Mar 15, 2012 at 12:46 PM, Jos Backus wrote: > "Finally, Red Hat seems to have largely switched to OpenJDK. This is > what JPackage is using for builds as well. Speaking of which -- what's your read on JPackage. It feels dead to me (and that's why Bigtop started packaging outside of immediate Bigdata scope) but I could be wrong. > There has been no need to > build a nosrc.rpm for a while now, assuming you're willing to give up > the Oracle JDK for the OpenJDK in your base OS." > > How do people here feel about this move? I think we have to bite the bullet and start supporting OpenJDK. At least as an alternative JDK to Oracle's one. That said I had reports about silly incompatibilities (like what a null would produce when turned into a string or something) that trip up Hadoop big time and nobody wants to spend time debugging it. Thanks, Roman.