Mailing-List: contact bigtop-dev-help@incubator.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: bigtop-dev@incubator.apache.org
Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of yuzhihong@gmail.com designates
 209.85.214.47 as permitted sender)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Date: Mon, 5 Dec 2011 21:04:30 -0800
Message-ID: 
 <CALte62whVg--Y=DLVguidG45EFwWwC4t-yEwjaE=KZf1xrRtjQ@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: stability of snapshot build from maven repository
From: Ted Yu <yuzhihong@gmail.com>
To: dev@hbase.apache.org
Cc: bigtop-dev@incubator.apache.org
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=001485f79318cd41c104b3655ed9

--001485f79318cd41c104b3655ed9
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1

Modifying the subject in case discussion continues.
Also removed discussion specific to HBase 0.92 RC.

On Mon, Dec 5, 2011 at 8:57 PM, Roman Shaposhnik <rvs@apache.org> wrote:

> Latest update on the issue: I ran the tests in a highly rigged environment
> with a classpath full of RC0 Hadoop 0.22 artifacts (instead of the snapshot
> ones from Maven). All of the tests pass now. I think this gets
> HBase/Hadoop RCs
> off the hook.
>
> Bigtop is now +1 on HBase 0.92RC/Hadoop 0.22RC
>
> Thanks,
> Roman.
>
> P.S. On a related note -- I really starting to *hate* how unreliable
> snapshots from
> Apache projects are. This is really bad and makes me think that perhaps,
> we'd be better off having a Bigtop-specific maven repo to which I can push
> artifacts when doing stack builds. So at least, Bigtop tests will be
> unaffected
> by something like this (sorry folks, I don't know how to help you in
> general
> case of mvn test, etc.)
>
> P.P.S. On the other hand, that's yet another piece of infra. we'd have to
> maintain :-(
>
>

--001485f79318cd41c104b3655ed9--