incubator-bigtop-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Andrew Bayer <>
Subject Re: [VOTE] Review then commit, or commit then review
Date Mon, 08 Aug 2011 18:38:54 GMT
I should mention that this vote isn't specifying how many +1s would be
needed, how long the vote period would be, etc. I think we should first
decide which overall philosophy we want to go with, and then the
implementation details of what we choose.


On Mon, Aug 8, 2011 at 10:06 AM, Andrew Bayer <>wrote:

> Hey all -
> I'm calling a vote on whether we should go with review then commit (R-T-C)
> or commit then review (C-T-R). See definitions at
> The vote's open for 72
> hours, and is open to anyone on the committers or mentors list at
> Thanks!
> A.

  • Unnamed multipart/alternative (inline, None, 0 bytes)
View raw message