incubator-bigtop-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Andrew Bayer <andrew.ba...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: License problem
Date Fri, 05 Aug 2011 18:07:51 GMT
Emailed legal-discuss and it sounds like we have to pull the class for now.
It'll need to either be replaced entirely or be pulled in as a binary
dependency. For 0.1.0, I'm fine with the tests not actually
compiling/working, but replacing this will need to be a top priority for the
next release.

A.

On Fri, Aug 5, 2011 at 10:43 AM, Andrew Bayer <andrew.bayer@gmail.com>wrote:

> Will do.
>
> A.
>
>
> On Fri, Aug 5, 2011 at 9:37 AM, Tom White <tom.e.white@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> This is probably best raised on legal-discuss
>> (http://www.apache.org/foundation/mailinglists.html#foundation-legal).
>>
>> Tom
>>
>> On Thu, Aug 4, 2011 at 12:51 PM, Andrew Bayer <andrew.bayer@gmail.com>
>> wrote:
>> > So one of the iTest files (
>> >
>> http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/bigtop/trunk/test/src/itest-common/src/main/groovy/com/cloudera/itest/junit/OrderedParameterized.java
>> )
>> > is a derivate of a JUnit class, and so is dual-licensed with the CPL.
>> But
>> > the CPL is a Category B license on
>> http://www.apache.org/legal/3party.html -
>> > which suggests that we at the very least don't want to include it, and
>> if
>> > possible, we should not use it. So does this mean we need to rewrite the
>> > class or get rid of it entirely? Anyone have thoughts?
>> >
>> > A.
>> >
>>
>
>

Mime
  • Unnamed multipart/alternative (inline, None, 0 bytes)
View raw message