incubator-bigtop-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Patrick Hunt <ph...@apache.org>
Subject Re: Review then commit, or commit then review?
Date Tue, 02 Aug 2011 00:32:22 GMT
for those of you new to apache comittership:
http://www.apache.org/foundation/glossary.html#CommitThenReview

be sure the read through the committer guide as well:
http://incubator.apache.org/guides/committer.html
http://www.apache.org/dev/new-committers-guide.html

Patrick

On Mon, Aug 1, 2011 at 3:39 PM, Andrei Savu <savu.andrei@gmail.com> wrote:
> +1 for review then commit. I believe that most of the Apache (all?) do this.
>
> -- Andrei Savu / andreisavu.ro
>
> On Mon, Aug 1, 2011 at 3:24 PM, Andrew Bayer <andrew.bayer@gmail.com> wrote:
>> So we should probably figure this out before we get any further. Are we
>> going to go with the review then commit model, or commit then review (i.e.,
>> ask permission or ask forgiveness)? Does anyone have any thoughts or
>> opinions on this?
>>
>> A.
>>
>

Mime
View raw message