incubator-bigtop-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Andrei Savu <savu.and...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: [VOTE] Review then commit, or commit then review
Date Mon, 08 Aug 2011 17:39:23 GMT
+1 for review-then-commit

I think it provides a good balance of speed and code quality plus
there are many initial committers so it should not take too long for a
patch to get a review.

-- Andrei Savu / andreisavu.ro

On Mon, Aug 8, 2011 at 10:06 AM, Andrew Bayer <andrew.bayer@gmail.com> wrote:
> Hey all -
>
> I'm calling a vote on whether we should go with review then commit (R-T-C)
> or commit then review (C-T-R). See definitions at
> http://www.apache.org/foundation/glossary.html. The vote's open for 72
> hours, and is open to anyone on the committers or mentors list at
> http://incubator.apache.org/projects/bigtop.html. Thanks!
>
> A.
>

Mime
View raw message