incubator-bigtop-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Andrei Savu <savu.and...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: Review then commit, or commit then review?
Date Mon, 01 Aug 2011 22:39:31 GMT
+1 for review then commit. I believe that most of the Apache (all?) do this.

-- Andrei Savu / andreisavu.ro

On Mon, Aug 1, 2011 at 3:24 PM, Andrew Bayer <andrew.bayer@gmail.com> wrote:
> So we should probably figure this out before we get any further. Are we
> going to go with the review then commit model, or commit then review (i.e.,
> ask permission or ask forgiveness)? Does anyone have any thoughts or
> opinions on this?
>
> A.
>

Mime
View raw message