incubator-bigtop-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Peter Linnell` <plinn...@cloudera.com>
Subject Re: [VOTE] Review then commit, or commit then review
Date Mon, 08 Aug 2011 22:34:48 GMT
On 08/08/2011 03:26 PM, Andrew Bayer wrote:
> Also, fwiw, I'm +1 on C-T-R. I personally think R-T-C has a place on a more
> mature project that needs to care more about controlling what gets in than
> embracing potential new committers, but I think we're not yet at the stage
> where we really need what R-T-C provides. I believe the increased velocity
> of C-T-R can be a big help to a project, especially one this early in its
> lifespan.
>
> A.
>
> On Mon, Aug 8, 2011 at 11:38 AM, Andrew Bayer<andrew.bayer@gmail.com>wrote:
>
>> I should mention that this vote isn't specifying how many +1s would be
>> needed, how long the vote period would be, etc. I think we should first
>> decide which overall philosophy we want to go with, and then the
>> implementation details of what we choose.
>>
>> A.
>>
>> On Mon, Aug 8, 2011 at 10:06 AM, Andrew Bayer<andrew.bayer@gmail.com>wrote:
>>
>>> Hey all -
>>>
>>> I'm calling a vote on whether we should go with review then commit (R-T-C)
>>> or commit then review (C-T-R). See definitions at
>>> http://www.apache.org/foundation/glossary.html. The vote's open for 72
>>> hours, and is open to anyone on the committers or mentors list at
>>> http://incubator.apache.org/projects/bigtop.html. Thanks!
>>>
>>> A.
>>>
>>
>>
>

At this point I'd vote +1 for CTR. Once we bootstrap Bigtop into a 
larger project, then we could revisit this. I think the priority is 
getting past the bootstrap stage.

Peter

Mime
View raw message