incubator-bigtop-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Steve Loughran <ste...@apache.org>
Subject Re: Review then commit, or commit then review?
Date Thu, 04 Aug 2011 11:42:19 GMT
On 02/08/11 19:05, Peter Linnell` wrote:
> On 08/02/2011 01:57 PM, Andrew Bayer wrote:
>> I'm personally neutral on this. I've had more experience with
>> commit-then-review, but as Andrei pointed out, review-then-commit is more
>> common in the Hadoop world.
>>
>> I do think that at this point, when there are still fairly trivial
>> changes
>> to be made in terms of license headers, name changes, etc, that a hard
>> and
>> fast review-then-commit approach may be a little over the top. Some
>> flexibility definitely makes sense for now.
>>

CTR is far more agile and used in most other ASF projects. RTC slows 
down hadoop and creates more veto conflict -it may be appropriate when 
the value of HDFS is the IPO value of Facebook and others, but not for 
bigtop.

Mime
View raw message