incubator-awf-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Séven Le Mesle <sleme...@xebia.fr>
Subject Re: Incubator PMC/Board report for Apr 2012 ([ppmc])
Date Wed, 04 Apr 2012 17:23:52 GMT
Looks good to me,
Thanks a lot ...

Séven.

2012/4/4 Emmanuel Lécharny <elecharny@gmail.com>

> Ok  guys,
>
> I have drafted something on http://wiki.apache.org/**incubator/April2012<http://wiki.apache.org/incubator/April2012>
>
> Just feel free to modify it if you think it's a bit too rough or if I
> missed something.
>
> If you don't have a login, I can update the page too.
>
> Thanks !
>
> Le 4/4/12 6:55 PM, Séven Le Mesle a écrit :
>
>> Hi,
>>
>> here is a short listing of the activities regarding the project since last
>> report:
>>
>>    1. Roger don't have time to work on AWF, and wish to abandon project
>>    development.
>>    2. New name AWF has been voted, and migration to AWF is now effective.
>>    3. Few Bugs were fixed thanks to Michele.
>>    4. Chunked encoding is now supported for POST and PUT requests
>> (Response
>>
>>    from the server does not use it).
>>    5. Old regexp oriented HTTP parser has been replaced by a new stream
>>
>>    oriented parser.
>>
>> That's all folks.
>>
>> Séven.
>>
>>
>> 2012/4/4 Emmanuel Lécharny<elecharny@gmail.com>
>>
>>  Le 4/4/12 5:17 PM, Mohammad Nour El-Din a écrit :
>>>
>>>  Hi...
>>>
>>>> On Wed, Apr 4, 2012 at 5:04 PM, Emmanuel Lécharny<elecharny@gmail.com>*
>>>> ***
>>>>
>>>> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>  Le 4/3/12 4:49 PM, Mohammad Nour El-Din a écrit :
>>>>
>>>>>  We have to prepare it max. by tomorrow  :)
>>>>> Seems like we have trouble with this incubating project :/
>>>>>
>>>>> I understand that Seven wants to pursue the effort (I know that he has
>>>>> some personal things to deal with that just exhaust the time he can
>>>>> devote
>>>>> to the project), but an incubating project should not depend on one
>>>>> single
>>>>> person.
>>>>>
>>>>> So, should we, mentors, draft something ?
>>>>>
>>>>>  I believe the problem here is more than just drafting something here:
>>>> 1- Depending on a single developer
>>>> 2- Not having a single release since the time being in the incubator
>>>>
>>>> That would raise some signals to the IPMC. I believe it is better to
>>>> bring
>>>> that to the private mailing list and have more discussions there ?
>>>>
>>>>  AFAICT, and since the last report, we had some activity. Not a lot, but
>>> still.
>>>
>>> Séven mentionned that someone could be a potential committer, then I
>>> would
>>> suggest that we start a vote.
>>>
>>> Otherwise, unless we really have some private things to discuss, I'd
>>> rather keep all the discussions on the public list. So far, there is
>>> nothing bad in openly discussing about the participation level.
>>>
>>> Now, we *have* to provide a report, even if it mentions that the project
>>> has some difficulties to sustain a high rate of commits. It's better than
>>> no report, which is an even worse message sent to the IPMC :)
>>>
>>>
>>> --
>>> Regards,
>>> Cordialement,
>>> Emmanuel Lécharny
>>> www.iktek.com
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>
>
> --
> Regards,
> Cordialement,
> Emmanuel Lécharny
> www.iktek.com
>
>


-- 
Séven Le Mesle
Xebia IT Architects

Email :  slemesle@xebia.fr
Mobile :    +33(0)1 46 91 76 16

http://www.xebia.fr
http://blog.xebia.fr

Siège Social
La Défense Colisée
10 / 12  Avenue de l'arche
Faubourg de l'Arche
92419 Courbevoie Cedex

Mime
  • Unnamed multipart/alternative (inline, None, 0 bytes)
View raw message