incubator-awf-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Emmanuel Lécharny <elecha...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: Incubator PMC/Board report for Apr 2012 ([ppmc])
Date Wed, 04 Apr 2012 17:09:02 GMT
Ok  guys,

I have drafted something on http://wiki.apache.org/incubator/April2012

Just feel free to modify it if you think it's a bit too rough or if I 
missed something.

If you don't have a login, I can update the page too.

Thanks !

Le 4/4/12 6:55 PM, Séven Le Mesle a écrit :
> Hi,
>
> here is a short listing of the activities regarding the project since last
> report:
>
>     1. Roger don't have time to work on AWF, and wish to abandon project
>     development.
>     2. New name AWF has been voted, and migration to AWF is now effective.
>     3. Few Bugs were fixed thanks to Michele.
>     4. Chunked encoding is now supported for POST and PUT requests (Response
>     from the server does not use it).
>     5. Old regexp oriented HTTP parser has been replaced by a new stream
>     oriented parser.
>
> That's all folks.
>
> Séven.
>
>
> 2012/4/4 Emmanuel Lécharny<elecharny@gmail.com>
>
>> Le 4/4/12 5:17 PM, Mohammad Nour El-Din a écrit :
>>
>>   Hi...
>>> On Wed, Apr 4, 2012 at 5:04 PM, Emmanuel Lécharny<elecharny@gmail.com>**
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>>   Le 4/3/12 4:49 PM, Mohammad Nour El-Din a écrit :
>>>>   We have to prepare it max. by tomorrow  :)
>>>> Seems like we have trouble with this incubating project :/
>>>>
>>>> I understand that Seven wants to pursue the effort (I know that he has
>>>> some personal things to deal with that just exhaust the time he can
>>>> devote
>>>> to the project), but an incubating project should not depend on one
>>>> single
>>>> person.
>>>>
>>>> So, should we, mentors, draft something ?
>>>>
>>> I believe the problem here is more than just drafting something here:
>>> 1- Depending on a single developer
>>> 2- Not having a single release since the time being in the incubator
>>>
>>> That would raise some signals to the IPMC. I believe it is better to bring
>>> that to the private mailing list and have more discussions there ?
>>>
>> AFAICT, and since the last report, we had some activity. Not a lot, but
>> still.
>>
>> Séven mentionned that someone could be a potential committer, then I would
>> suggest that we start a vote.
>>
>> Otherwise, unless we really have some private things to discuss, I'd
>> rather keep all the discussions on the public list. So far, there is
>> nothing bad in openly discussing about the participation level.
>>
>> Now, we *have* to provide a report, even if it mentions that the project
>> has some difficulties to sustain a high rate of commits. It's better than
>> no report, which is an even worse message sent to the IPMC :)
>>
>>
>> --
>> Regards,
>> Cordialement,
>> Emmanuel Lécharny
>> www.iktek.com
>>
>>
>


-- 
Regards,
Cordialement,
Emmanuel Lécharny
www.iktek.com


Mime
View raw message