Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-incubator-any23-dev-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-incubator-any23-dev-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 61E4595B1 for ; Thu, 16 Feb 2012 16:40:00 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 96076 invoked by uid 500); 16 Feb 2012 16:40:00 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-incubator-any23-dev-archive@incubator.apache.org Received: (qmail 96043 invoked by uid 500); 16 Feb 2012 16:40:00 -0000 Mailing-List: contact any23-dev-help@incubator.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: any23-dev@incubator.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list any23-dev@incubator.apache.org Received: (qmail 96034 invoked by uid 99); 16 Feb 2012 16:40:00 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 16 Feb 2012 16:40:00 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=1.5 required=5.0 tests=HTML_MESSAGE,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of lewis.mcgibbney@gmail.com designates 209.85.213.47 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.213.47] (HELO mail-yw0-f47.google.com) (209.85.213.47) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 16 Feb 2012 16:39:54 +0000 Received: by yhfq46 with SMTP id q46so1361459yhf.6 for ; Thu, 16 Feb 2012 08:39:33 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type; bh=TPRbm8v1S9IG8sBwkA+EoFABqnw5N3R5NwhKPblWwtU=; b=u+yI8vItmpzjSASesgswvmpGuZdkZnMC/PnoU+fCoIW8yN9xzEvmtnrDBzjGGcorbe IzCdh6Kq57aAapfRtn6Tat+XU6zsUNI8ylJn/CvZ9B+x6ltHU+y2IkZRcBC5AARZt3wu XhG5c6Df8Vwe+pXunkIUt3n2s7ks2Rpc027Ms= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.101.138.33 with SMTP id q33mr1282290ann.76.1329410373346; Thu, 16 Feb 2012 08:39:33 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.236.108.147 with HTTP; Thu, 16 Feb 2012 08:39:33 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <4F3D1390.3000705@apache.org> References: <4F36DADD.1000100@apache.org> <4F3D1390.3000705@apache.org> Date: Thu, 16 Feb 2012 16:39:33 +0000 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [DISCUSSION] 0.7.0 Release From: Lewis John Mcgibbney To: any23-dev@incubator.apache.org Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=0016e68ee34810676304b917792a --0016e68ee34810676304b917792a Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 I agree with this Andy. I'm in the process of updating the site and will ensure that everything is up to scratch. I would really like to see us moving towards an Any23-0.7.0 release VOTE soon. The one thing I am really puzzled about, is where we are actually using the LGPL library in our code? I have also removed the dependency from the pom.xml and my basic-crawler plugin tests fail, however looking at the test cases there appears to be no direct link to the libraries! Lewis On Thu, Feb 16, 2012 at 2:32 PM, Andy Seaborne wrote: > On 12/02/12 19:06, Simone Tripodi wrote: > >> Hi Andy! >> >> >>> ANY23-37 is a blocker for releasing basic-crawler because it is a legal >>> matter. >>> >>> >> +1, without any doubt! >> -Simo >> > > So it seems that ANY23-37 requires the code to be removed from an Apache > release - dsiutils is unlikely to be relicensed with a compatible license. > > That may turn out to be a large chunk of work. > > Is there a useful subset of any23 that can be released without > basic-crawler? Doing a release of something-not-everything is still worth > doing for the process. > > If there is, I'd suggest doing a release-of-something and letting > basic-crawler catch up. > > Andy > -- *Lewis* --0016e68ee34810676304b917792a--