Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-incubator-any23-dev-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-incubator-any23-dev-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id D32619F69 for ; Fri, 17 Feb 2012 20:12:25 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 19111 invoked by uid 500); 17 Feb 2012 20:12:25 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-incubator-any23-dev-archive@incubator.apache.org Received: (qmail 19081 invoked by uid 500); 17 Feb 2012 20:12:25 -0000 Mailing-List: contact any23-dev-help@incubator.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: any23-dev@incubator.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list any23-dev@incubator.apache.org Delivered-To: moderator for any23-dev@incubator.apache.org Received: (qmail 80761 invoked by uid 99); 17 Feb 2012 19:25:33 -0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.7 required=5.0 tests=SPF_NEUTRAL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: neutral (athena.apache.org: local policy) X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: Av0EAKioPk8KhJ0N/2dsb2JhbABDsiSBB4F1AQEEAXkFCwsNCxwSVwYTiAAJtg+LdAIJChIGAwYBBQUQCAICAh0Dgz0FIwcDCAaCUWMEmzaMaQ X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.73,439,1325462400"; d="scan'208";a="22602735" Subject: Re: any23.org Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v1084) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252 From: Richard Cyganiak In-Reply-To: Date: Fri, 17 Feb 2012 19:25:03 +0000 Cc: any23-dev@incubator.apache.org, Michele Mostarda Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Message-Id: <055D1150-3476-42D0-9046-E09FD04C2527@cyganiak.de> References: <4B085DB9-75C3-4D17-B28B-11E61D36C81B@cyganiak.de> To: Lewis John Mcgibbney X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1084) X-OriginalArrivalTime: 17 Feb 2012 19:25:03.0543 (UTC) FILETIME=[D927EC70:01CCEDA9] Lewis, On 17 Feb 2012, at 18:46, Lewis John Mcgibbney wrote: > I was basically trying to ask whether you are happy for the Any23 = service to remain on any23.org, however run on Apache infrastructure. Thanks, this helps. =46rom a technical point of view this makes sense and I'd like to see it = happen. There's a bit of branding on any23.org from the various contributors to = the original project. Would that have to go? In that case I'd need to = check back with them. I'm cc'ing Michele =96 he might be able to speak for FBK and DERI = regarding the logos. There's also the old project website at http://developers.any23.org/ . = What do you think should happen to that? All the best, Richard > We have opened a ticket here [1] to track the progress and Daniel = (infrastructure team) asked whether a new DNS would need to be set up... = maybe something along the lines of service.any23.apache.org. This may be = unnecessary depending upon what your feelings are with any23.org? >=20 > Thanks for getting back to us on this one. >=20 > [1] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/INFRA-4439 >=20 > On Fri, Feb 17, 2012 at 6:35 PM, Richard Cyganiak = wrote: > Hi Lewis, >=20 > Thanks for getting in touch. It's great to see any23 make its process = through the incubator process. >=20 > I'm not quite sure what you're asking though. A bit more detail would = be helpful. What exactly is the issue with the current situation around = the any23.org domain? >=20 > Best, > Richard >=20 >=20 > On 17 Feb 2012, at 16:43, Lewis John Mcgibbney wrote: >=20 > > Good Afternoon Richard, > > > > We are in the process of sorting out an Any23 webservice that = doesn't site the old Googlecode site, and which adheres to ASF trademark = policy etc. > > > > One of the issues is whether or not we would (be able to) retain the = any23.org DNS. > > > > I wonder if you can comment here? > > > > Thank you in advance. > > > > Lewis > > > > -- > > Lewis > > >=20 >=20 >=20 >=20 > --=20 > Lewis=20 >=20