incubator-ambari-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Andres Danter <adan...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: Adding Accumulo to Ambari
Date Wed, 19 Jun 2013 00:42:19 GMT
Perfect.  Thanks, Billie.

Andres


On Tue, Jun 18, 2013 at 8:39 PM, Billie Rinaldi <billie.rinaldi@gmail.com>wrote:

> On Tue, Jun 18, 2013 at 5:10 PM, Andres Danter <adanter@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > Hi Billie,
> >
> > Thanks for that response.  Now I understand and feel much better about
> the
> > process.
> >
> > One more question.  Under ambari-server/src/main/resources/stacks/ I see
> > HDP and HDPLocal, which both contain directories for each Ambari version.
> > Do I add the ACCUMULO directory under both of those subtrees or just one
> in
> > particular?
> >
>
> I found information about HDPLocal vs. HDP here:
>
> http://incubator.apache.org/ambari/1.2.3/installing-hadoop-using-ambari/content/ambari-chap1-6.html
>
> HDPLocal is what you use if you aren't connected to the internet when you
> install, so it seems like you'd want both.
>
>
> >
> > e.g.  stacks/HDP/<version>/services/ACCUMULO
> >           &/or
> >         stacks/HDPLocal/<version>/services/ACCUMULO
> >
> > Ok, I lied.  I have an additional question that I just thought of.  In my
> > proposal I said I was going to work with Ambari 1.2.2, but I don't see
> that
> > directory under HDP or HDPLocal.  Should I just do the work under 1.3.0?
> >
>
> I think 1.3.0 would be the right one since it corresponds to the current
> trunk.  (Anyone feel free to chime in if this is incorrect.)
>
> Billie
>
>
> >
> > Thanks,
> >
> > Andres
> >
> >
> > On Tue, Jun 18, 2013 at 7:53 PM, Billie Rinaldi <
> billie.rinaldi@gmail.com
> > >wrote:
> >
> > > Andres,
> > >
> > > You will create a patch and attach it to the appropriate ticket.  We
> will
> > > review the patch, giving you feedback and probably requesting
> revisions,
> > > and you keep making new patches and adding them to the ticket until the
> > > community is happy.  At that point, a committer will commit the patch
> for
> > > you.
> > >
> > > A patch can contain an entire new sub-tree.  If you use svn, "svn
> status"
> > > shows you the files that have changed in the current directory.  Ones
> > that
> > > are entirely new have a question mark next to them.  To add them to the
> > > patch, use "svn add <fileOrDirectory>".  If you add a directory it
> > > recursively adds all the files in the directory.  To create the patch,
> > use
> > > for example "svn diff > AMBARI-1930-1.patch", then after a first round
> of
> > > revisions, "svn diff > AMBARI-1930-2.patch".  The one-up numbering
> isn't
> > > strictly necessary, but it makes it easier to see what is the most
> recent
> > > patch that needs to be reviewed.
> > >
> > > If you want to use git instead, the commands are slightly different.  I
> > can
> > > help you with those as well, if you'd prefer.
> > >
> > > Billie
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > On Tue, Jun 18, 2013 at 4:19 PM, Andres Danter <adanter@gmail.com>
> > wrote:
> > >
> > > > Hi Billie,
> > > >
> > > > I was about to start working on adding Accumulo to the Ambari stack
> > > > definition, as outlined on the Ambari wiki.  I have to admit that I'm
> > > being
> > > > a bit shy with getting started on this.  I'm mostly worried about
> > > > submitting changes that will clobber something and cause headaches
> for
> > > > everyone.  I did read the "How to Commit" section on the wiki, but I
> > > still
> > > > have a couple of questions regarding the submission of patches.
> > > >
> > > > 1.  Since I'm not an authorized committer, would you be the one that
> > > > actually commits the patches?  Or will I do it with your approval?
> > > >
> > > > 2.  Since adding Accumulo to the stack definition involves the
> creation
> > > of
> > > > a new directory structure under ambari-server/src/main/resources/, is
> > it
> > > > considered a patch?  How should I make the work available to the
> > > community
> > > > for review?  I can write a document with the details of the service
> > and a
> > > > zip file that contains the new sub-tree.  Would that be sufficient?
> > > >
> > > > I guess what I'm worried about here is how to proceed once I have a
> > > > finished piece that can be committed, whether it is a completely new
> > > > addition or a patch to existing source.
> > > >
> > > > Thanks for the help.
> > > >
> > > > Andres
> > > >
> > >
> >
>

Mime
  • Unnamed multipart/alternative (inline, None, 0 bytes)
View raw message