incubator-ambari-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Andres Danter <adan...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: Adding Accumulo to Ambari
Date Wed, 19 Jun 2013 11:32:01 GMT
Thank you, Yusaku.  I will add ACCUMULO to both then.

Andres


On Tue, Jun 18, 2013 at 8:44 PM, Yusaku Sako <yusaku@hortonworks.com> wrote:

> Andre, you should be working off of trunk, and adding ACCUMULO to the
> 1.3.0 stack (as that is the latest version that works on trunk).
> Just FYI, there are references to the Hadoop 2.0 stack in trunk, but
> that is not expected to work yet; branch-1.4.0 is the active branch
> for Hadoop 2.0 work.
>
> HDP vs HDPLocal will likely be consolidated and removed in the future,
> but for now, please add ACCUMULO service definition to both.
>
> Hope this helps.
>
> Yusaku
>
> On Tue, Jun 18, 2013 at 5:39 PM, Billie Rinaldi
> <billie.rinaldi@gmail.com> wrote:
> > On Tue, Jun 18, 2013 at 5:10 PM, Andres Danter <adanter@gmail.com>
> wrote:
> >
> >> Hi Billie,
> >>
> >> Thanks for that response.  Now I understand and feel much better about
> the
> >> process.
> >>
> >> One more question.  Under ambari-server/src/main/resources/stacks/ I see
> >> HDP and HDPLocal, which both contain directories for each Ambari
> version.
> >> Do I add the ACCUMULO directory under both of those subtrees or just
> one in
> >> particular?
> >>
> >
> > I found information about HDPLocal vs. HDP here:
> >
> http://incubator.apache.org/ambari/1.2.3/installing-hadoop-using-ambari/content/ambari-chap1-6.html
> >
> > HDPLocal is what you use if you aren't connected to the internet when you
> > install, so it seems like you'd want both.
> >
> >
> >>
> >> e.g.  stacks/HDP/<version>/services/ACCUMULO
> >>           &/or
> >>         stacks/HDPLocal/<version>/services/ACCUMULO
> >>
> >> Ok, I lied.  I have an additional question that I just thought of.  In
> my
> >> proposal I said I was going to work with Ambari 1.2.2, but I don't see
> that
> >> directory under HDP or HDPLocal.  Should I just do the work under 1.3.0?
> >>
> >
> > I think 1.3.0 would be the right one since it corresponds to the current
> > trunk.  (Anyone feel free to chime in if this is incorrect.)
> >
> > Billie
> >
> >
> >>
> >> Thanks,
> >>
> >> Andres
> >>
> >>
> >> On Tue, Jun 18, 2013 at 7:53 PM, Billie Rinaldi <
> billie.rinaldi@gmail.com
> >> >wrote:
> >>
> >> > Andres,
> >> >
> >> > You will create a patch and attach it to the appropriate ticket.  We
> will
> >> > review the patch, giving you feedback and probably requesting
> revisions,
> >> > and you keep making new patches and adding them to the ticket until
> the
> >> > community is happy.  At that point, a committer will commit the patch
> for
> >> > you.
> >> >
> >> > A patch can contain an entire new sub-tree.  If you use svn, "svn
> status"
> >> > shows you the files that have changed in the current directory.  Ones
> >> that
> >> > are entirely new have a question mark next to them.  To add them to
> the
> >> > patch, use "svn add <fileOrDirectory>".  If you add a directory it
> >> > recursively adds all the files in the directory.  To create the patch,
> >> use
> >> > for example "svn diff > AMBARI-1930-1.patch", then after a first
> round of
> >> > revisions, "svn diff > AMBARI-1930-2.patch".  The one-up numbering
> isn't
> >> > strictly necessary, but it makes it easier to see what is the most
> recent
> >> > patch that needs to be reviewed.
> >> >
> >> > If you want to use git instead, the commands are slightly different.
>  I
> >> can
> >> > help you with those as well, if you'd prefer.
> >> >
> >> > Billie
> >> >
> >> >
> >> >
> >> >
> >> > On Tue, Jun 18, 2013 at 4:19 PM, Andres Danter <adanter@gmail.com>
> >> wrote:
> >> >
> >> > > Hi Billie,
> >> > >
> >> > > I was about to start working on adding Accumulo to the Ambari stack
> >> > > definition, as outlined on the Ambari wiki.  I have to admit that
> I'm
> >> > being
> >> > > a bit shy with getting started on this.  I'm mostly worried about
> >> > > submitting changes that will clobber something and cause headaches
> for
> >> > > everyone.  I did read the "How to Commit" section on the wiki, but
I
> >> > still
> >> > > have a couple of questions regarding the submission of patches.
> >> > >
> >> > > 1.  Since I'm not an authorized committer, would you be the one that
> >> > > actually commits the patches?  Or will I do it with your approval?
> >> > >
> >> > > 2.  Since adding Accumulo to the stack definition involves the
> creation
> >> > of
> >> > > a new directory structure under ambari-server/src/main/resources/,
> is
> >> it
> >> > > considered a patch?  How should I make the work available to the
> >> > community
> >> > > for review?  I can write a document with the details of the service
> >> and a
> >> > > zip file that contains the new sub-tree.  Would that be sufficient?
> >> > >
> >> > > I guess what I'm worried about here is how to proceed once I have
a
> >> > > finished piece that can be committed, whether it is a completely new
> >> > > addition or a patch to existing source.
> >> > >
> >> > > Thanks for the help.
> >> > >
> >> > > Andres
> >> > >
> >> >
> >>
>

Mime
  • Unnamed multipart/alternative (inline, None, 0 bytes)
View raw message